Simple question, who would you have on their prime?.
Not the biggest Bergkamp fan but he contributed more in big games than Cantona and Zola, who were mainly big bullies of small teams.
Cantona, Zola or Bergkamp
posted on 18/8/14
Also, Cantona was 26 after the Leeds title season ended... So you can wipe that off. (He celebrated his 26th birthday on May 24th 1992, a full 3 weeks after Leeds last game)
The things you learn on the toilet!!
posted on 18/8/14
posted on 18/8/14
comment by HK - Proud Kenyan (U8418)
posted 4 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Andy Carrot (U2440)
posted 1 minute ago
None of them did it in the CL.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
agreed. Actually cantona and Zola were complete failures in Europe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gianfranco scored the winning goal in the 1998 cup winners cup final. Not a complete failure!
posted on 18/8/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/8/14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Usmjudsjybg
posted on 18/8/14
agreed. Actually cantona and Zola were complete failures in Europe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gianfranco scored the winning goal in the 1998 cup winners cup final. Not a complete failure!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zola also won UEFA Cup with Parma
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm glad that someone pointed these facts out. The '98 winner he had only been on the field for 17 seconds.
I also remember him and Flo tearing Barca a new one in the '99 Champions League Quarter Final first leg.
posted on 19/8/14
Both Zola and Cantona had disappointing (or at least underwhelming) international careers, whereas Bergkamp is probably one of Holland's all-time greats, consistently performing in qualifiers and at major tournaments.
That fact always gave me the impression that maybe part of the reason Cantona and Zola were so impressive was because our league was quite poor when they came over and exotic skillful foreigners like them were something new and exciting.
Not that they weren't outstanding and very entertaining players mind.
posted on 19/8/14
whereas Bergkamp is probably one of Holland's all-time greats, consistently performing in qualifiers and at major tournaments.
----------------------------------------------------------
One night in 2005, a handful of Dutch legends gathered for a dinner in an Amsterdam house.
As the night wore on, the conversation inevitably turned to ‘who was the greatest Dutch player of all time?’
Instantly, the great striker Jan Mulder chose a player who had come close, but never won the Ballon d’Or or even a Champions League medal.
“Dennis Bergkamp,” Mulder announced, “He had the finest technique.”
The room went silent, Guus Hiddink nodded his head in agreement, and the matter was settled.
posted on 19/8/14
posted on 19/8/14
comment by Mick Dee - War Came; War Saw; War Cöcked Up (U14135) posted 26 minutes ago
He was a top player
But he wasn't better than Cruyff
And with that the matter is settled
--------------
Who's opinion is more valid;
1. Mulder and Hiddink
2. Man on internet
You decide