We should have kept him.
What do you guys think?
:D
We should have kept Fryatt
posted on 7/6/11
Personally I think it is time to move on. He's not our player any longer and I think he was becoming frustrated at lack of opportunities at Leicester. He probably needed the move as well. New club, new challenge etc.
posted on 7/6/11
It suited both parties and im glad for him that it happened. And we got a decent fee for him too
posted on 7/6/11
I was disappointed that he couldn't make it under Sven because I still think he's a skilful player and will score goals. However, I agree with others - onward and upward. For whatever reason, it wasn't working for him here any more and both sides had to move on.
posted on 7/6/11
To be honest, where Sven wants to take us I don't think Matty would of been up to it. Although I was a fan when he was here, was time to move on for both parties really.
posted on 7/6/11
I personally didnt want him to go but maybe it was best for all partys. We made 1.5M, Fryatt plays and Hull get a good striker. Maybe there was a risk he was going stale here
posted on 7/6/11
I was a Fryatt fan as he is a goal scorer, which is a rare commodity at any level.
What I always thought was if he were to go from good to great - he'd need to improve his consistency. Scoring 20 goals in 20 matches would be much more valuable than scoring 20 in 10 and then going missing for 10.
I hoped he would gain that consistency with us. Now I hope he'll be one of those players who'll never quite be great.
posted on 8/6/11
No
posted on 8/6/11
Fryatt was a goalscorer when it suited him. He's a good Championship player when his confident is high but he's not the sort of player Sven would be interested in.
No doubt, whenever we are playing cr@p fans remember him as if he were Pele and label Sven a turnip for getting rid of him. His ghost haunts the Walkers when we are doing rubbish, with some fans.
posted on 4/7/11
why is this on the hull board ?