info regarding Antenucci situation

Sorry to be a tad controversial here, but some of us have been crying out for the 'goal scoring' player to be played whilst many on here shot us down and insisted we played the 'striker that couldn't hit a barn door' if he tried.

Maybe Redfern just doesn't like him? It might be him who has decided he doesn't warrant another year?

After all his contract says he has exclusive rights to pick the team. He said it himself only this week.

Nothing controversial about your comments Eccers, which I agree with by the way.

My opinion has always been that Redders favours his academy boys over the Cellino signings, after all, he never stops talking about the academy and his boys.

Agreed Stoopo in regards to the contract clause, which throws Redders into the mix so to speak.

Spot on Eric

For me we should be playing Antenucci and if he scores more goals then surely he's worth an extended contract?

Interesting.

It's all about money and Cellino's big ego!

Its called a boss, and being called boss it can override anything anyone/thing doesn't do to its liking!..

People should think on, it is referring to Cellino, he is the boss, if Redder's was holding back surely him being the boss would say "ey up old chap, that's going against the agreement I made up with his agent!..

Mind you, as it seems, he got the goals that helped keep us where we are, and being safe he don't need him any more!..

Why should he keep to his word if it means him paying an extra year?..

Oh, and before we all forget, someone on these boards did say a long time ago how he is with players and contracts, and even stated that when it didn't go his way he shoves them on the sidelines!..

Well said Jonty!.