I rate Eric Dier and do believe he is a really good utility man, that can ply his trade across a few different positions within the team. He reads the game well and is technically sound whilst being a man mountain. However I would rather see him given a settled position wherever that may be. I do believe this to be in the back four to be honest!
I am hoping Poch doesn't see him as the long term option for this role, he has now been tested in this role a few times in pre-season games. Is this showing how weak we are in midfield ATM, or do people think that this is Poch's master plan for Eric?
He always seems to get the short straw!
Thoughts?
Eric Dier - CDM
posted on 30/7/15
Hopefully Poch isn't having to do a Blue peter job of here is one I prepared earlier
posted on 30/7/15
Dier played as a defensive midfielder twice for sporting. Hauled off as a sub on both occasions.
It is a strange move by poch. I am all for everyone having flexibility providing they have the tools or history to play there.
I mean Kyle walker has played left back three times in his career winning man of the match twice. Therefore in an emergency no probs with him filling in there.
Dier looks like he should be able to play there but pochs playing Russian roulette with his development especially if he puts him there against United. Verts and Toby have both played there more,even Danny rose has played in central midfield more surely you would risk someone else.
As I keep saying we need bodies and quick otherwise come 1st September we could be fighting a losing battle already.
I can see it now....us getting stuffed by United, losing to stoke and fans all of a sudden getting on someone like diers back.
posted on 30/7/15
No. We should stop trying to take shortcuts or the cheap option and go and buy a proper DM. If the scouts are unable to locate some suitable targets across Europe then they need sacking. Simple as that.
posted on 30/7/15
LLM I always like and rate your posts. Your comment is spot on! Ledley's knee I thought that was the whole purpose of bringing in Mitchell, although still all is quite on the Western front! Seriously we are as light on the ground as I remember, having to play in four tournaments mean a few injuries or burn out and it's game over come Xmas!
posted on 31/7/15
Too early to call for me. The immediate downsides to me are:
1. We still lack experience in midfield .
2. It means we will probably see quite a bit of Frankenstein's monster at the back.
Did anybody watch the full game the other night? How did he do?
posted on 31/7/15
HRH we were ok. Not great at the back, suppose it's a work in motion. Saying that if it wasn't for their GK we would've won. Both teams looked good going forward, but suspect at defending!
posted on 31/7/15
Cheers fella, good workout for us at altitude for fitness. Heard the pitch played like old school astroturf, flat and dry?
How did Dier do in particular? Did he look noticably out of place?
posted on 31/7/15
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
posted on 31/7/15
He looked ok. But don't think his long term future is midfield, against better opposition our midfield would've been over ran. Kane missed a few chances both took his goal well.
posted on 31/7/15
But*