My weigh in on the ticket prices debate

Been a lot of ticket price controversy recently, particularly with the PSG home game, here is my opinion:

There have been several articles from the MEN and the 1894 group moaning about the £60 ticket prices which isnt fair on the club:

The £60 is the highest possible price anybody can pay for a non "corporate seat", season ticket holders and cityzens get £5 off, so the only people who would ever pay £60 are tourists and a few locals who would argue they can't afford a season ticket or cityzens membership.

My point towards these few fans based in manchester who can't afford season tickets or cityzens membership (which I agree is very overpriced given that all you get is access to buy tickets) is if you are moaning that PSG at home is too expensive, i bet there majority of you werent there for Hull or Palace in the cup for £5 or even a cup semi final v everton for £15 so you have little right to start moaning that PSG is too expensive when you wont even attend when prices are very cheap.

As a season ticket holder that goes to a lot of away games and nearly all cup games, and as a student, so living on a tight budget compared to most people earning a wage, I am more than happy to pay what the club is charging for PSG.

Of course, as an 18-21, i get a slight discount on the tickets, my seat for PSG cost £40 compared to my Dad's £55..

But, an adult can get a seat for £40 for PSG which seems very reasonable for a champions league quarter final second leg.

This is cheaper than nearly all premier league away games for city fans and not too far off most fans average price for home games.

I understand people want tickets as cheap as possible, but i think fans that are complaining are being pretty unfair on the club as £40 for a champions league quarter final 2nd leg is a fair price.

Would be interested to hear what you lot reckon?