or to join or start a new Discussion

23 Comments
Article Rating 3 Stars

Usmanov

Apparently his company is sponsoring Everton, via naming rights to our training ground and possible shirt sponsorship for £75 million. Now we all know he is mates and business partner of Moshiri. How do Arsenal fans feel about this? As I asked last year, do you think he might jump ship and buy into Everton?

posted on 6/1/17

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 23 minutes ago
We have totally screwed Usmanov. All them clowns wanted Kronke for some daft reason with his proven record of.messing up sports teams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From the outside, it appears Kronke want to make profit and doesn't care as much about silverware. It appears usmanov want to make profit from Arsenal being more successful. Just the way I interpret it.

posted on 7/1/17

Meh....why would Lady Bracewell share her shares to The American if Usmanov is the right person?

posted on 7/1/17

comment by I Will Not Change My Name (U8613)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
Meh....why would Lady Bracewell share her shares to The American if Usmanov is the right person?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure she said she regrets it now.

posted on 7/1/17

Where? She might be regretting for selling at knockdown price.

posted on 7/1/17

Comment Deleted by Article Creator

posted on 7/1/17

Yeah, that makes sense as I have the authority to sell West Ham.

posted on 7/1/17

comment by I Will Not Change My Name (U8613)
posted 22 minutes ago
Where? She might be regretting for selling at knockdown price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No the way he's treating the club,she said she wasn't expecting him to do what he's doing.

posted on 7/1/17

The club got into bed with Stan for the same reason we never bought expensive players for years. Because at the time being profitable was more important than silverware.

The club HAD to be as low-risk as possible for as long as possible money/debt-wise. At the time, Stan represented an almost guaranteed, strong-powerhouse (financially) 25 years into the future. Usmanov would have been more of a risk in those terms.

His trophy priority and Roman rivalry would no doubt have seen him personally underwrite the club right up until the day FFP kicked in. Which could potentially cause problems that would not be encountered under Stan.

We may well be paying a price for that now but it was the most sensible and IMO correct choice, at the time. I mean lets be honest, at least the last five years, Stan hasn't exactly sat on his wallet. We all know we can effectively afford any player we want to go pay for. And looking at the squad we have and chances this season. We've really not paid too much of a price at all for Stan being the man. HE is probably the last person to blame for no league title. Because the blame on that is squarely at the feet of the players and manager. They could have done it by now if not for some truly spine/desire-less performances.

posted on 7/1/17

She made that comment after handing over the keys to the American? That shows her naivety if it's true.

posted on 7/1/17

comment by I Will Not Change My Name (U8613)
posted 6 minutes ago
She made that comment after handing over the keys to the American? That shows her naivety if it's true.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She didn't see it coming Naive b!tch.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available