.....next season, as Chelsea will get better IMO. Up to five players are not worth their place in the squad (especially Sissoko - what a waste of money he is! And Janssen is proving to be like Soldado! )
But positives from last season in Premier League are:
Scored most goals
Conceded least number of goals
Best goal difference
Only team to have unbeaten home record
Wanyama was one of the best 5 players in Premier League IMO. Son was one of our best players scoring 21 goals in all competitions. But I think we still need to buy a top class attacking midfielder or striker to supplement Kane up front!
Dembele was on the bench for a few games, will he want to leave if this continues?
Not optimistic we'll win the title.....
posted on 26/5/17
From SWTN's helpful stats we can now all agree about these indisputable facts.....
When Chelsea have won the league, 80% of those occasions they have not got past the first KO round in Europe.
When Chelsea have got to the QF or further in Europe, they have won the league on just 10% of these occasions.
posted on 26/5/17
comment by wearethefamousTHFC (U19211)
posted 1 day, 21 hours ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Feyenoord Champions (U1250)
posted 23 minutes ago
You'll walk top 4. That's for sure. But 1st will be a challenge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not for sure.
The expenditure this summer will be vast from all the top 6 clubs.
Tottenham also had a very good year with injuries.
I personally think the two Manchester clubs and Chelsea will fight it out for the title.
Jose and Pep are going to keep breaking the bank.
What nonsense as usual
UTD spent 200 million and went backwards
Liverpool have spent hundreds of millions and tread water
We have a settled team who know how they want to play and will be right up there again next season
Heard all this nonsense last yr
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahh, so because you heard it last year, it renders the point invalid for the coming season?
Very strange logic.
Alls I said was that the clubs will spend obscene amounts of money and will more than likely improve.
The original suggestion was that THFC would walk top 4. I merely said that in an age of vast expenditure and when injuries can make such a difference, nothing is guarenteed.
As for the inclusion of bans and fatigue in your injury table - laughable.
posted on 26/5/17
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
From SWTN's helpful stats we can now all agree about these indisputable facts.....
When Chelsea have won the league, 80% of those occasions they have not got past the first KO round in Europe.
When Chelsea have got to the QF or further in Europe, they have won the league on just 10% of these occasions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello moron he word is challenging for both not winning both.....................
posted on 26/5/17
Hello moron he word
posted on 26/5/17
t- he ultimate sours
posted on 26/5/17
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
From SWTN's helpful stats we can now all agree about these indisputable facts.....
When Chelsea have won the league, 80% of those occasions they have not got past the first KO round in Europe.
When Chelsea have got to the QF or further in Europe, they have won the league on just 10% of these occasions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello moron he word is challenging for both not winning both.....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He whole discussion is about whether he extra European games is a hindrance or not if you aim to win the league
Not challenging. Challenging means being in he race. We were in he race. We know you can challenge.
You have provided he evidence, and he evidence shows Chelsea have only won the league 10% of the time when getting to the QF or further in Europe. Their
He evidence also shows 80% of Chelsea's title wins have come when they have exited Europe at the first KO round or not been in Europe at all.
He evidence shows Chelsea's two European wins came when they finished 6th and 3rd.
Hat is all I have to post really
posted on 26/5/17
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
From SWTN's helpful stats we can now all agree about these indisputable facts.....
When Chelsea have won the league, 80% of those occasions they have not got past the first KO round in Europe.
When Chelsea have got to the QF or further in Europe, they have won the league on just 10% of these occasions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello moron he word is challenging for both not winning both.....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He whole discussion is about whether he extra European games is a hindrance or not if you aim to win the league
Not challenging. Challenging means being in he race. We were in he race. We know you can challenge.
You have provided he evidence, and he evidence shows Chelsea have only won the league 10% of the time when getting to the QF or further in Europe. Their
He evidence also shows 80% of Chelsea's title wins have come when they have exited Europe at the first KO round or not been in Europe at all.
He evidence shows Chelsea's two European wins came when they finished 6th and 3rd.
Hat is all I have to post really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HRH having a field day with the dunce bunch
posted on 26/5/17
I mean we all knew it is an obvious advantage to olay less games.
This eejit helpfully posted a full history that backed it up
posted on 26/5/17
Hello morons still upset
posted on 27/5/17
Nope, highly amusing