or to join or start a new Discussion

48 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Giroud

Would you take him for £40m ?

posted on 3/7/17

comment by John Double Doe (U21516)
posted 1 minute ago
But Lukaku is being quote at £100m and would mean less game time for Rashford and martial
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That's a terrible excuse not to sign a player. We shouldn't sign X because he's better than Y, who we already have.

posted on 3/7/17

Don't get me wrong, id take Lukaku all day long. But I don't think we Will. I'd therefore get a good striker in whilst the youngsters learn the trade.

71 in 148 in england for Lukaku.

posted on 3/7/17

I am not saying we should sign Lukaku. I just used him as an example of a striker who plays for a team that are not as prolific as scoring as Arsenal.

A goal scoring ratio of 1 every 2.3for the major striker of a free scoring team like Arsenal is nothing to write home about.

posted on 3/7/17

Just out of.interest, what striker would you like us to sign?

posted on 3/7/17

Again with the less game time for martial and rashford

If you are going to shell out 40 mill for a striker you arnt considering the impact on the players you already have.

posted on 3/7/17

You are if the alternative is a £70m striker who has to start

posted on 3/7/17

Oh

posted on 3/7/17

Fack dat

posted on 3/7/17

Would be facking brilliant if you did. Please take Ramsey too

posted on 3/7/17

If we're gonna get a squad player striker we'd be better off getting Chicharito back for 13 million.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available