Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I'd honestly rather give Rooney 40 games next season.
I'd take him on for nothing, the big handsome bassa
Only if we can get Gibbs as well for another 50 mill
Giroud for 40m is a better deal than the 16m we paid for Welbeck
Gets goals
Prem proven
Wouldnt hugely impact rashford / Martials development
Gettable
"Wouldn't hugely impact rashford/ martials development"
Is that really a consideration in a potential signing
Not as if you've got a full complement up front.
Yes, unless you aren't bothered about Rasgford and Martial getting game time up front
The new signing should only be signed on the basis of what he can bring to the team and not on the possible impact on current players
Nah. Sorry mate. You are wrong there.
Yeh because Jose has instructed ed to only sign players who won't stunt the development of rashford and martial
😕
Yeh because Jose has instructed ed to only sign players who will stunt the development of rashford and martial
We shouldn't sign Giroud for any fee unless Arsenal were willing to take Rooney and Groot as part of the deal.
And even then I would be sceptical.
Only those that are gettable and are prem proven
😉
No. Giroud is a good player. Very underrated imo but he's 30, not in the top bracket of strikers or has the potential to be.
Id back him to get 15 goals - 20 goals. Plus he wouldn't go mad if he was dropped for Rashford or Martial.
comment by John Double Doe (U21516)
posted 27 minutes ago
Id back him to get 15 goals - 20 goals. Plus he wouldn't go mad if he was dropped for Rashford or Martial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For 40 million you want more than that, especially for a 30 year old.
I think it would be a good deal
I respect your opinion but we should be aiming higher than Giroud
He'd be like a slow, downgraded Zlatan.
No thanks
And he would impact on Rashford and Martial's development.
He'd send em backwards with his frustrating play
RDD
Why do you think it would be a good deal? There isn't any evidence to suggest it would be.
Sign in if you want to comment
Giroud
Page 1 of 2
posted on 3/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/7/17
I'd honestly rather give Rooney 40 games next season.
posted on 3/7/17
I'd take him on for nothing, the big handsome bassa
posted on 3/7/17
Only if we can get Gibbs as well for another 50 mill
posted on 3/7/17
Giroud for 40m is a better deal than the 16m we paid for Welbeck
posted on 3/7/17
Lol
posted on 3/7/17
Gets goals
Prem proven
Wouldnt hugely impact rashford / Martials development
Gettable
posted on 3/7/17
"Wouldn't hugely impact rashford/ martials development"
Is that really a consideration in a potential signing
posted on 3/7/17
Not as if you've got a full complement up front.
posted on 3/7/17
Yes, unless you aren't bothered about Rasgford and Martial getting game time up front
posted on 3/7/17
The new signing should only be signed on the basis of what he can bring to the team and not on the possible impact on current players
posted on 3/7/17
Nah. Sorry mate. You are wrong there.
posted on 3/7/17
Yeh because Jose has instructed ed to only sign players who won't stunt the development of rashford and martial
😕
posted on 3/7/17
Yeh because Jose has instructed ed to only sign players who will stunt the development of rashford and martial
posted on 3/7/17
We shouldn't sign Giroud for any fee unless Arsenal were willing to take Rooney and Groot as part of the deal.
And even then I would be sceptical.
posted on 3/7/17
Only those that are gettable and are prem proven
😉
posted on 3/7/17
No. Giroud is a good player. Very underrated imo but he's 30, not in the top bracket of strikers or has the potential to be.
posted on 3/7/17
Id back him to get 15 goals - 20 goals. Plus he wouldn't go mad if he was dropped for Rashford or Martial.
posted on 3/7/17
comment by John Double Doe (U21516)
posted 27 minutes ago
Id back him to get 15 goals - 20 goals. Plus he wouldn't go mad if he was dropped for Rashford or Martial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For 40 million you want more than that, especially for a 30 year old.
posted on 3/7/17
I think it would be a good deal
posted on 3/7/17
Awful suggestion really
posted on 3/7/17
I respect your opinion but we should be aiming higher than Giroud
posted on 3/7/17
He'd be like a slow, downgraded Zlatan.
No thanks
posted on 3/7/17
And he would impact on Rashford and Martial's development.
He'd send em backwards with his frustrating play
posted on 3/7/17
RDD
Why do you think it would be a good deal? There isn't any evidence to suggest it would be.
Page 1 of 2