so according to optimum sports the following are the 5 top EPL most expensive squad
Mancity- 345m
Man u- 261m
Liverpool- 259m
CHelsea- 213m
Arsenal- 191m
EPL most expensive squads
posted on 16/9/11
"Giggs didn't cost anything, so wouldn't have been an expense for Man U"
-----
Regardless of that, Giggs will still have a value, which would have decreased in recent years.
posted on 16/9/11
That cannot be right can it?
If you think Torres, Luiz and Mata cost £100m.
posted on 16/9/11
MonDieu - 2stars is the new 1star (U9200)
It's squad cost not value.
posted on 16/9/11
Thanks Robbing...Mon Dieu...ner ner ner ner na!
and as for chelsea, they have moved on quite a few that they spent big money on haven't they? so it probably is right, unless it's not up to date??
posted on 16/9/11
good to see that Liverpool have spent more than us
posted on 16/9/11
Chelsea current squad cost a lot more than that (you do the maths).
like to know howe they came to these figures or has the OP just made it all up????????
posted on 16/9/11
Yes, sorry Giggs was a bad example. Did not want to use just Chelsea players to avoid it being suggested I was ageist.
posted on 16/9/11
Is this based on wages or transfers?
posted on 16/9/11
If that is the value of the current squad Man utd have done well as there net spend is over £300m less then chelsea and man city.
posted on 16/9/11