Is that based on current values because obviously players like Lampard, Drogba and Giggs would have devalued because of age ?
Giggs didn't cost anything, so wouldn't have been an expense for Man U
"Giggs didn't cost anything, so wouldn't have been an expense for Man U"
-----
Regardless of that, Giggs will still have a value, which would have decreased in recent years.
That cannot be right can it?
If you think Torres, Luiz and Mata cost £100m.
MonDieu - 2stars is the new 1star (U9200)
It's squad cost not value.
Thanks Robbing...Mon Dieu...ner ner ner ner na!
and as for chelsea, they have moved on quite a few that they spent big money on haven't they? so it probably is right, unless it's not up to date??
good to see that Liverpool have spent more than us
Chelsea current squad cost a lot more than that (you do the maths).
like to know howe they came to these figures or has the OP just made it all up????????
Yes, sorry Giggs was a bad example. Did not want to use just Chelsea players to avoid it being suggested I was ageist.
Is this based on wages or transfers?
If that is the value of the current squad Man utd have done well as there net spend is over £300m less then chelsea and man city.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
EPL most expensive squads
Page 1 of 1
posted on 16/9/11
Is that based on current values because obviously players like Lampard, Drogba and Giggs would have devalued because of age ?
posted on 16/9/11
Giggs didn't cost anything, so wouldn't have been an expense for Man U
posted on 16/9/11
"Giggs didn't cost anything, so wouldn't have been an expense for Man U"
-----
Regardless of that, Giggs will still have a value, which would have decreased in recent years.
posted on 16/9/11
That cannot be right can it?
If you think Torres, Luiz and Mata cost £100m.
posted on 16/9/11
MonDieu - 2stars is the new 1star (U9200)
It's squad cost not value.
posted on 16/9/11
Thanks Robbing...Mon Dieu...ner ner ner ner na!
and as for chelsea, they have moved on quite a few that they spent big money on haven't they? so it probably is right, unless it's not up to date??
posted on 16/9/11
good to see that Liverpool have spent more than us
posted on 16/9/11
Chelsea current squad cost a lot more than that (you do the maths).
like to know howe they came to these figures or has the OP just made it all up????????
posted on 16/9/11
Yes, sorry Giggs was a bad example. Did not want to use just Chelsea players to avoid it being suggested I was ageist.
posted on 16/9/11
Is this based on wages or transfers?
posted on 16/9/11
If that is the value of the current squad Man utd have done well as there net spend is over £300m less then chelsea and man city.
posted on 16/9/11
Page 1 of 1