Better to count 1-1,000,000 than

Do you think Drogba is the best Striker in the PL era?

No don't, i would say Aguero, Shearer and Henry all have a very strong case to be rated higher but Drogba is right up there with them.

When you throw in names like Andrew Cole into the mis and try and justify it in such limited fashion, then that is frankly laughable.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You carefully ommited the key phrase in that post.........."in isolation"

You are so desperate here that you are being deceitful for all to see.................what a loser
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go with the ad-hominems again

Sticks and Stones mate

comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 2 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You carefully ommited the key phrase in that post.........."in isolation"

You are so desperate here that you are being deceitful for all to see.................what a loser
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go with the ad-hominems again

Sticks and Stones mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Caught red handed and deflecting

comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 4 minutes ago
Do you think Drogba is the best Striker in the PL era?

No don't, i would say Aguero, Shearer and Henry all have a very strong case to be rated higher but Drogba is right up there with them.

When you throw in names like Andrew Cole into the mis and try and justify it in such limited fashion, then that is frankly laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you able to make a point without being condescending?

You could have just said 'I don't think Cole should come into the equation because......' and I could respect that.

That stats have value. Just not in isolation as you so eloquently pointed out.

A point I have already agree with.

comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 2 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You carefully ommited the key phrase in that post.........."in isolation"

You are so desperate here that you are being deceitful for all to see.................what a loser
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go with the ad-hominems again

Sticks and Stones mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Caught red handed and deflecting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflecting what?

I have agreed with all of your points.

Keep fishing.

Do you mean non condescending posts like this?

Complete and utter nonsense

Out of the 6 players I mentioned Drogba has scored the least goals and has the worst goals to appearance ratio.

Henry and Aguero alone average just shy of 0.7 goals per game.

Drogba's average was a little over 0.4 per game.

That statistic alone shows that those 2 players were/are 75% more likely to score than Drogba was.

In addition, Drogba is 5th out of 6 in assists so to try and argue he is more influential is complete folly.

comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 2 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You carefully ommited the key phrase in that post.........."in isolation"

You are so desperate here that you are being deceitful for all to see.................what a loser
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go with the ad-hominems again

Sticks and Stones mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Caught red handed and deflecting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflecting what?

I have agreed with all of your points.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From your deliberate attempt to change the context of an original post by only partially requoting it

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflecting what?

I have agreed with all of your points.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From your deliberate attempt to change the context of an original post by only partially requoting it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You've assumed that I did that. Of course I have no way of proving my intent but changing the context was not it

My point was that whether they are isolated or not, that doesn't make them any less true or less valuable.

They are just not providing the complete picture (a point that I have already agreed with you on).

For you to dismiss them out of hand only strengthens my position that you are incapable of a reasonable debate. Ad hominems and all.

Given that we have agreed on several points, including the original argument, I'm struggling to understand why you feel the need to carry on this discussion.

The only logical and obvious conclusion is that you are wumming, which really is sad.

Keep fishing.

comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 35 minutes ago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflecting what?

I have agreed with all of your points.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From your deliberate attempt to change the context of an original post by only partially requoting it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You've assumed that I did that. Of course I have no way of proving my intent but changing the context was not it

My point was that whether they are isolated or not, that doesn't make them any less true or less valuable.

They are just not providing the complete picture (a point that I have already agreed with you on).

For you to dismiss them out of hand only strengthens my position that you are incapable of a reasonable debate. Ad hominems and all.

Given that we have agreed on several points, including the original argument, I'm struggling to understand why you feel the need to carry on this discussion.

The only logical and obvious conclusion is that you are wumming, which really is sad.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both know it was intentional, no need to kid yourself, you are not kidding me.

comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 35 minutes ago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflecting what?

I have agreed with all of your points.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From your deliberate attempt to change the context of an original post by only partially requoting it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You've assumed that I did that. Of course I have no way of proving my intent but changing the context was not it

My point was that whether they are isolated or not, that doesn't make them any less true or less valuable.

They are just not providing the complete picture (a point that I have already agreed with you on).

For you to dismiss them out of hand only strengthens my position that you are incapable of a reasonable debate. Ad hominems and all.

Given that we have agreed on several points, including the original argument, I'm struggling to understand why you feel the need to carry on this discussion.

The only logical and obvious conclusion is that you are wumming, which really is sad.

Keep fishing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We both know it was intentional, no need to kid yourself, you are not kidding me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have it your way

have a good weekend