or to join or start a new Discussion

22 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Mourinho v Kane contracts

What is the different between Mourinho v Kane contracts ?

Mourinho had 3 years left but had to feck off - feck his contract
Kane has 3 years left, but needs to stay and rot in the stands - contract is contract

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 3/8/21

comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 3/8/21

comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause he was fooking useless, Kane is a player and be it a very good one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So contracts mean nothing if it fits your narrative.

posted on 3/8/21

comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs

posted on 3/8/21

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 3/8/21

comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?

posted on 3/8/21

comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:

Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.

Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.

Hope that’s helped.

posted on 3/8/21

comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:

Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.

Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.

Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Spurs can say 'your contract means nothing' as far as Mourinho is concerned but then say 'you signed a cast iron contract, live with it' to Kane, talk about double standards.

Also Kane is well within his rights if there was a gentleman's agreement between him & Levy, especially if Levy had a 'reasonable offer' clause in it as £100m (reportedly offered by City) is a very reasonable offer in everybody else's eyes.

Free the 'Tottenham One'

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 3/8/21

comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:

Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.

Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.

Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.

I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.

I never made this an employer/employee article.

Hope that helps too ffs

posted on 4/8/21

comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:

Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.

Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.

Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.

I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.

I never made this an employer/employee article.

Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One love.....more like one brain cell

posted on 4/8/21

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.

Care to explain what I am missing?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:

Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.

Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.

Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.

I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.

I never made this an employer/employee article.

Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One love.....more like one brain cell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on yourself, I'm sure if you try you can increase that to 2 brain cells and finally get your IQ into positive figures.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available