Saka vs Rashford

Would barely take Saka over Dan James the few weeks, annoyingly since I put him in my FF side.

Rashford, Sakas a better player though for sure and in a few more years experience might be more reliable.

Saka on the left is better.

Rashford on the right is better.

Daft article.

Fack me I'm tired, mixed up my left and right 😄

Saka has a lot more to his game than Rashford (which isn't saying much) + he has 4 extra years.

But I'd never take an AFC player over a united one - AFC players are more likely to be, or become, a cheater.

I'd leave them both on the bench for as long as was possible. Both are average, journeyman and accordingly over-hyped

I'm happy to see that the majority of posters agree that rashford is a superior player.
If saka was playing with the likes of Weghorst on a weekly basis, he would have precisely 0 assists.

Rashford creates his own luck. Saka on the other hand expects others to bury the chances.

comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 21 minutes ago
Fack me I'm tired, mixed up my left and right 😄
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I let you get away with that. Fair play for fessing up.

Saka is 21 years old, rashford is 25. Have some shame.

comment by IAmMe (U18491)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
Saka has a lot more to his game than Rashford (which isn't saying much) + he has 4 extra years.

But I'd never take an AFC player over a united one - AFC players are more likely to be, or become, a cheater.

I'd leave them both on the bench for as long as was possible. Both are average, journeyman and accordingly over-hyped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't know what journeymen means you plonker

IAmMe is a bit of a simpleton.