Garnacho's goal should've stood

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 37 minutes ago
here is is below. It was going in so why was it just disallowed cos his own player put it in on the line?

https://youtu.be/j5gDJfFvObg?si=sxHDPqC0PRvk7Pg6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not offside.

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 56 minutes ago
here is is below. It was going in so why was it just disallowed cos his own player put it in on the line?

https://youtu.be/j5gDJfFvObg?si=sxHDPqC0PRvk7Pg6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are Barry and #4zA the same person?

I’ve been wondering about this for a while now as there seems to be a lot of similarities in how they write!

The only doubt for me is that #4zA actually makes more sense!

comment by Peks - Comanche Moon (U6618)
posted 4 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
6 yard boxes. What do they even do? Is having somewhere to place the ball for a goal kick really worthy of a box on every pitch around the country? What do the sides of the 6 yard box even do?

Could we not just say the keeper takes the goal kick roughly six yards from the goal line and we save trillions of gallons of paint over hundreds of years across the country?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do we use grass?
Money could be saved here in multiple places, one being the grass, two the water to maintain the grass, three the staff to maintain the grass and four the amount of ecosystems we must the destroying by playing football on the grass, what about the ants and other such bugs who have made homes there?
Players should play on concrete, it'll require much less maintenance and the cost overhead would be massively lower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf are you on about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The government is cost cutting in the wrong places.
Have players play on concrete and save billions a year maintaining grass in stadiums across the globe.
There should be a central world government where great leaders such as Putin and trump should put plans into place for the good of the planet.
Think of the amount of water that can be diverted from stadium's to poor countries in need.
The possibilities are endless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂😂 I like it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scotland currently has enough water for the whole facking continent

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about when a rapist scores a goal should it be given or not?

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about when a rapist scores a goal should it be given or not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see how this is relevant at all. Harit scored. Now 1-1.

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about when a rapist scores a goal should it be given or not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see how this is relevant at all. Harit scored. Now 1-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referees allow a goal to stand by a person who should be behind bars. Arsenal should've won 1-0 yesterday. If a certain rapist was in prison they would've had 10 men on the field which would have been a big advantage for Villa.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about when a rapist scores a goal should it be given or not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see how this is relevant at all. Harit scored. Now 1-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The referees allow a goal to stand by a person who should be behind bars. Arsenal should've won 1-0 yesterday. If a certain rapist was in prison they would've had 10 men on the field which would have been a big advantage for Villa.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah actually thought you were talking about the Ronaldo goal from the video lol. Nevermind

comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Michel Pageaud (U1734)
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
It was the same as that Ronaldo disallowed goal for Portugal that would have been his greatest ever goal but Nani put it in on the line when he was offside. Should that have stood?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a bit different when it’s a deliberate action, however it must be so rare perhaps a rule change is over the top.

Common sense suggests the ball was going in anyway and it was an action from a previous pass which made contact with the ball unavailable.

Very unlucky and I can’t actually think of another time it’s happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Loads of times when it hits a player in an offside position and deflects in, even if it would have gone in anyway. It would open up a massive can of worms if you changed a black and white rule to being "yeah but I think I should give it anyway" as being the refs decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
u sayin that if Zirkzee was white the gol wuddastud?