What a player.
Ten Hag
posted 20 hours, 15 minutes ago
A ten Hag stinker.
And if you go back, there are some folks that justified him not being in the squad with the usual nonsense, “ you are not on the training ground.” The usual suspects.
posted 20 hours, 14 minutes ago
I think Garnacho's played 4 games on the right this season under Ten Hag. I wasn't posting on here at the time but were ppl clamouring for Amad to play there instead of Garnacho back then? I wasn't hearing much of that, the conversations were usually around whether it was fair on Garnacho to stick him there to keep Rashford on the left.
Btw Amad in that time made 9 appearances on the right.
posted 19 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 17 minutes ago
I think Garnacho's played 4 games on the right this season under Ten Hag. I wasn't posting on here at the time but were ppl clamouring for Amad to play there instead of Garnacho back then? I wasn't hearing much of that, the conversations were usually around whether it was fair on Garnacho to stick him there to keep Rashford on the left.
Btw Amad in that time made 9 appearances on the right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was. I said very early in the season that Garnacho and Rashford should not start in the same team.
posted 19 hours, 53 minutes ago
I’m old enough to remember Ten Losses Hag saying that Antony deserved to start over Amad as he was training better.
Now we’ve seen just how awful Ten Hags teams were set up I can just imagine how suboptimal those ‘training’ sessions were
posted 19 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 17 minutes ago
I think Garnacho's played 4 games on the right this season under Ten Hag. I wasn't posting on here at the time but were ppl clamouring for Amad to play there instead of Garnacho back then? I wasn't hearing much of that, the conversations were usually around whether it was fair on Garnacho to stick him there to keep Rashford on the left.
Btw Amad in that time made 9 appearances on the right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was. I said very early in the season that Garnacho and Rashford should not start in the same team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, Rashford was playing most on the LW with Garnacho and Amad and others alternating on the RW with both sometimes subbing for the other on that side as well.
Fwiw I feel Rashford is done at United but I don't believe Garnacho's not suited to Amorim's style. For me, Garnacho's just another casualty of the underdevelopment of our academy players after breaking through to the first time in the past 5/6 years. It's true for Garnacho, it was the same for McTominay, the same for Greenwood. And the same for Rashford btw.
Amad is a talent but much of his development has been abroad and I think he's more adept and experienced which perhaps has helped him respond quicker and better to what Amorim and his coaching team wants.
For Garnacho who's stagnated it may take longer. What he needs is coaching and development and he'll become a top player at United. I'm glad Amorim and his backroom staff are here to do it. If we don't do it I've no doubt another club will.
posted 19 hours, 41 minutes ago
*first team
posted 19 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 33 minutes ago
A ten Hag stinker.
And if you go back, there are some folks that justified him not being in the squad with the usual nonsense, “ you are not on the training ground.” The usual suspects.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSOLUTELY. I could name some of them, but I’m sure they’ll deny it.
posted 18 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 17 minutes ago
I think Garnacho's played 4 games on the right this season under Ten Hag. I wasn't posting on here at the time but were ppl clamouring for Amad to play there instead of Garnacho back then? I wasn't hearing much of that, the conversations were usually around whether it was fair on Garnacho to stick him there to keep Rashford on the left.
Btw Amad in that time made 9 appearances on the right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was. I said very early in the season that Garnacho and Rashford should not start in the same team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also called it with Antony and Amad same side and gunned down by certain idiots. I can see exactly what you were getting at.
posted 12 hours, 2 minutes ago
That idiot started Mazz in attack than starting Amad. At a point, Amad wanted to cry when he was coming on at the 88 minute or so wondering what he was doing here. Ruud was having to motivate one of the most hard working players on the team to not lose hope. As soon as ETH left, Ruud immediately showed you his own talent assessment was miles better than the bald facking fraud.
He should be brought in, flogged, then sacked again.
posted 7 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Redastomatoes- Feels very Moyesian...cleverson forever!If he is good enough he is ready! (U12026)
posted 4 hours, 5 minutes ago
That idiot started Mazz in attack than starting Amad. At a point, Amad wanted to cry when he was coming on at the 88 minute or so wondering what he was doing here. Ruud was having to motivate one of the most hard working players on the team to not lose hope. As soon as ETH left, Ruud immediately showed you his own talent assessment was miles better than the bald facking fraud.
He should be brought in, flogged, then sacked again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣🤣🤣