39 innings in a tournament final, average of 54. 6 centuries, 10 half-centuries.
Versus pakistan in WCs:
5 matches, 313 runs. A mere average of 78 and 3 MoM awards.
Clearly, the guy does not perform when it matters!
Tendulkar doesn't perform on the big stage?
posted on 12/11/11
@ Footie
Lara has lower number of runs in ODI and Tests.
Lara has lower average in ODI and tests.
Lara never won a World Cup.(Understandable...it's a team game..But no Cup with Ambrose & Walsh bowling is poor.)
Lara-Sachin in World Cups isn't even worth a comparison.
Sachin is best... prove otherwise haha
posted on 12/11/11
lara has not played the number of games as shorty sachin
his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played
if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman
posted on 12/11/11
"his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played"
"if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman "
...................................................................
OMG !! Does THIS explain your brain or the Pakistani education system ??
I think both..
posted on 12/11/11
haha...can't believe he did a LOL after THAT post.
posted on 12/11/11
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/11
haha neon, same can be said about Footie's brain as well
posted on 12/11/11
I prefer Dravid to Tendulkar .I find him a more pleasent fella.Thats just my personal opinion..
During the England test series Sachin's attitude with the none existant issues of behind the bowlers arm. were to much..IMO he acted like that cause he knew he was likely to get out due to the England bowling a good lenght..
Dravid on the other hand just got on with it and reaped the rewards.,He also was the only Indian with any fight in him..
posted on 12/11/11
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/11/11
"lara has not played the number of games as shorty sachin
his average is low of course because his number of games played are less than what shorty has played
if a player starts playing from what 16 or 17 and is still playing at the age of i dunno 37 then definitely that player will have an average greater than bloody don bradman "
------------------------------
I would not participate in such arguments saying "my dad is better than yours" etc. but this particular comment made me sit up. Really? You could bring lots of other things about Sachin (2003 & 2011 finals failure, even the ball-biting allegation if you like), but your argument is totally foolish (mildly put).
posted on 13/11/11
The idea that the more games you play the higher your average will be, flies in the face of reality.
Micheal Clarke once had an average above 70 after a handful of games as did Trott, not any more though.