Modric is not a bad, but certainly not a great player. His performances particularly against the big 4 is not convincing and Spurs will want an inflated offer for the Bloke. 9 goals and 15 assists in the premier league since arrival to me does not warrant paying over the moon for
Personally i will suggest we get Pastore. we can get him at about the same price as what spurs will want for Modric, younger and got great talent
Fellas what do you think
Do we really need Modric?
posted on 16/6/11
Completely disagree with this article
First of all, stats are not everything. Xavi, Iniesta, Scholes, Makelele-their goal stats are distinctly unimpressive but I don't think there can be any doubting their importance
Anyone with half a brain can see just how important thse players are. Modric for my money was Spurs best player last season. Reads the game so brilliantly, watch a Spurs game and see how many of their chances originate from Modric
If I was an advisor to Roman I would say sign him up whatever it takes
posted on 16/6/11
Modric is overrated. 3 assists this season is hardly tge creative master peice we are seeking for. He would get found out at the top level. All he is a decent passer and Mikel is already a very good passer. I'd rather see Josh given a chance
posted on 16/6/11
Silly statement
Stats can lie
Modric is class just like xavi
posted on 16/6/11
Totally agree with you GSKE BLUE ARMY (U2352)
posted on 16/6/11
Us missing out on Modric would be a blessing in disguise,because then we can focus on getting Pastore only.
posted on 16/6/11
Comparing Modric to Xavi is an insult to Xavi. Modric is just a decent Premier League midfielder. What does he do that Adam, Nasri, and McCarthy all NOT do, considering those players would be younger anc cheaprr - and two of them are homegrown.
posted on 16/6/11
Wigan apparently looking for £20 million for McCarthy, wouldn't be much cheaper. Blackpool won't let Adam go on the cheap either, Pool's interest will inflate the price hugely
Nasri for £10-15 million would be worth a punt I'll admit but as I've said above imo we need Modric more
posted on 16/6/11
It is shocking people comparing xavi or iniesta to modric?While i agree that stats is not everything, we need to bear in mind that the most important element our current team lack at this moment is a player who can provide the final pass for our strikers(Torres) and i do not see Modric as the best option in the market especially when we can get a younger more talented player(Pastore) at about the same price. I would even prefer Arsenal Nasri who will be available at almost half the price Spurs will want for Modric
posted on 16/6/11
Modric took you apart almost single-handedly.
How on earth anyone can confidently state that Modric is not a great player is beyond me! Have you people never watched him play? And I don't mean from the comfort of your armchair. Have you actually been to a match and seen how he controls the midfield? Almost invariably, whoever we play (and I'm including our draw against United last season), Moddy is the best player on the park.
And that is the very reason why we won't sell him. There is no price you could (willingly) give us that would make it worth our while selling him. If we did sell him, we would, effectively, be conceding 4th and 5th places next season.
posted on 16/6/11
You Chelsea fans are so fickle. Last week everyone was calling for Pastore, Sneijder, or Neymar, and as soon as there is news of a failed bid for Modric, suddenly he's everyone's favorite player.
Not to mention the amount of "fans" calling for 2-3 £40mil+ signings is ridiculous. Not to mention you guys just splashed out £75mil 6 months ago.