I can understand some posters getting angry and using the filter .I think that is the last resort to filter a persons post,I also tend to wait and then react with certain posters(picking an opportune moment) or ignore them!I also would have filtered WoW but on that score ive changed my mind,any difference of opinion I will try by dialogue and stop calling him Walleye.I also realise that people can follow the same team but all have different thoughts and views concerning Rovers and our predicament at this moment in time is also not easy.People who say lets all get behind the team etc are well meaning but let down with the clowns we have who control the team.I for one am convinced we are going to the Championship and if we fall further I will still follow Rovers because I dont know anything else from Blackburn Rovers with football.
posted on 24/11/11
Wow try to get on with your fellow Rovers!I also have been quite vexed with some of your post ,answers and retorts.I am now trying to accept you as moronic as some of your posts are.
posted on 24/11/11
There was nothing wrong with what I said though. Frustrating when your comment lasts 2 minutes and is gone. I admit I deleted some comments when I was new. I realised it is immature so I stopped.
posted on 24/11/11
"The only people that filter are the ones who can't stand to read other peoples opinion because they think that there's are the only one that matter."
Strange comment indeed. There are other better reasons for putting someone on the filter.
posted on 24/11/11
The only people that filter are the ones who can't stand to read other peoples opinion because they think that there's are the only one that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. I've filtered wow because he posts irritating, distracting garbage on every single thread. Its like a bunch of adults talking and a bored child dancing round them shouting rubbish. Would the adults constantly stop their conversation to converse with the child's pointless exclamations? No, they'd ignore it. I just find it easier to ignore wow with the filter on, its the internet equivalent of ear plugs. Of course the same argument could apply to our current resident WUM Wayne but like all these sad cases I don't expect his shelf life to be long. I suppose he'll be a source of minor amusement until he gets bored and goes the way of Uncle_Anaethesia, onlyonejohnbarnes etc.
posted on 24/11/11
The thing is I've seen uncle actually post the occasional half decent post. Wayne's actually got involved on the post about homophobia.
You have to wander why some stalk boards merely to irritate, especially as on the whole it lacks humour...
posted on 24/11/11
The art of debate is to be able to take your own opinions and be able to discuss them without blinkers on. So take Vins opinions on the Walkers, that's poor as blinds the ability to see subtleties. I like to beleive that even with my dislike for Mr Kean I can listen to anyone trying to justify his tenure and will happily change my OPINION if someone can put a convincing case forward
posted on 24/11/11
People filter and delete for all different reasons. In my earlier post I was just stating one reason why I think it is done, personally a can't be bothered to do either.
posted on 24/11/11
You stated it was the only reason.
posted on 24/11/11
I just thought I would bring this debate out in the open,im glad ive done this has it seems to have cleared the air a little!It might even help one or two posters to think before they post things.
posted on 24/11/11
DD sorry a stated wrong