Great Result Chelsea Fans

No I don't,I think he's too wasteful. He's going to be judged on the goals that he scores. I saw the flick to Defoe on the highlights and it was brilliant but I also saw some glaring misses. My opinion...too wasteful and others agree who went to the matches.

OTHERS started the sexist comments Joe. I think I've been very practical in my comments. Who is the loser?

Chameleon and Sandsend

Doh Chameleon and smelly sandsend. They contributed NOTHING.

OK Dawn I was just kidding, we beat City last night, and I am still buzzing from it, however lets post seriously

"Spurs scored against Bolton in the 7th minute and then not again until the 60th or something. Well i don't have to go to the match to see that that wasn't very good."

By your comment here you think that because there were no goals scored in the 53 or so minutes, that the game wasn't very good. A scoreless football match can be rivetting, as can an ebb and flow scoreless period, the score is dictated by the goals, not the quality of the game.

Making predictions re football is a very funny business, you see we all remember those we got right, but forget those we got wrong


"i think Torres and Carroll are rubbish and I haven't seen them play. Everybody agrees that they are rubbish and they've seen them play but we share the same opinion."

Who are the "everyone" you talk about?

For the best part most people think Carroll was overpriced, as was Torres, overpriced is different to rubbish.

There is not one pundit out there who calls them rubbish, they have made it to the top of their profession, and play for 2 of the top clubs in the country, rubbish footballers dont get that far

Sorry Joe, I was taking the Mick, no offence meant to either you or the Dorris

Doris has one R twonk.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

And the points raised, sugar lumps

comment by SANDSEND 59 fenton, fenton, FENTON, oh jesus christ !!! (U6325)
posted 47 minutes ago

And the points raised, sugar lumps
--------------------------------------------