Value for money

comment by United, Team of Man (U11181)

=====================

You just wasted your breath, mate. There's no point in talking sense to a buffoon.

Then this will be my last comment on this thread.

Chill out rude boy

Cahill, no thanks. Good luck to him at Chelsea but United didnt need him...

Evans is decent. Better than the likes of koscielny

And when arsenal could have had him aswell ... where would we be now with out wilshere for half a year!
My advice to wenger and ferguson ... When a golden opportunity looks you in the mouth... take it.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

That is what I am stating here on serveral occasions too.

Batmanu: Why do you think the guy is rubbish is beyond me. We were apparrently interested in Cahill before the season.

Yes we bought Mertesacker who turned out to be decent at least but as the OP said: We want to be at the top and a big team. Watch out at City. They bought also player who not necessarily play in every game but they can rotate whenever it is needed. Do we have the same luxury? I think not.

So let ne get this straight, we missed a trick by not signing a defender from the club with the worst defensive record in the league.

Jesus wept

ManUtd: Is that only Cahill's fault the mess Bolton are in? Think not. Imo Wenger shouldnt miss the opportunity to sign him up for only 7 mios. for the reasons I comment on this thread already.

Maybe he's good enough for Arsenal. He isn't good enough for Utd

Wenger and SAF don't usually get it wrong,if he was a top player the ywould have shown more interest. Cahill's a decent player but we've got at least four centre backs already at the club who are better than him in my opinion, i think Cahill is a good example of an english player being hyped up by the media, bit like the player he could potentially replace in the Chelsea team long term.