or to join or start a new Discussion

45 Comments
Article Rating 3.67 Stars

Another fine Welbeck performance today.

It's so great to see him playing for Utd, a product from the youth and a Utd fan.

I think today was his 9th of the season ? But its not just his goals it's his all round game that is impressive. He gets stuck in, gets involved, he doesn't just stand there waiting for the ball.

He has good movement and excellent skill, and it's easy to forget he has only just turned 21.

The loan last season at Sunderland worked a treat and we are reaping the rewards from that loan spell.

It's a shame for Hernandez and Berbatov as neither of these will get into the side unless Welbeck was badly injured today, does anyone have an update ?

posted on 14/1/12

4-3-3

Anderson, Jones Carrick

Welbeck, Rooney, Valencia

posted on 14/1/12

Rooney is rubbish up top on his own

----------------------------------------------------

He didn't do too badly up top on his own at the Emirates two seasons ago.

posted on 14/1/12

True. But that was two seasons ago. Whenever I see him play up top on his own more recent he's not been as good.

He gets isolated, and then frustrated, and a frustrated Wayne Rooney is a liability. He likes to be involved in everything.

posted on 14/1/12

The big problems United had at Arsenal playing 4-4-1-1 were IMO

1. Song in Rooney's space

2. Hernandez not doing much

3. United being unable to exploit the wings on the break because wide players were naturally deep.

4. United's lack of a holding player meant the hole was always available for RVP to drop into or Arsenal's midfielders to run into (the system meant that Carrick couldn't operate as a holding player as he had to provide midfield support).

Playing 4-1-2-3 instead of 4-4-1-1 would solve all those problems, whereas they would still exist (apart from the Hernandez issue if Welbeck is fit) if we go 4-4-1-1 again.

The question is how much would Welbeck's performance help United to overcome the problems associated with playing 4-4-1-1 against Arsenal?

I don't know if playing Welbeck is as important as making sure United are well suited tactically to facing Arsenal.

Sir Alex could always bring on Welbeck later in the game if a change is needed.

comment by TheOne (U12248)

posted on 14/1/12

Welbeck on the left wing is pants. If people suggest we drop Nani for Welbeck then woe to you. Such a stupid idea! We should go 442 with Welbeck as a forward not a bloody left winger

posted on 14/1/12

Welbeck wouldn't be left winger it's 4-3-3

posted on 14/1/12

We don't need Wellbeck against Arsenal , Nani will who that game on his own well with a bit of help from Evra .

posted on 14/1/12

We don't need Wellbeck against Arsenal , Nani will who that game on his own well with a bit of help from Evra .

------------------------------------------------

What?

posted on 14/1/12

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by TheOne (U12248)

posted on 15/1/12

Captain_Positivity

You seriously are thick. If we went with Welbeck and Valencia instead of Nani. They would not be forwards. Valencia as a forward He would be out wide and so would Welbeck. It's not our style to have forwards hence why 433 does not work as we just put them out wide and Rooney gets isolated. Nani has to play this match as we need some sparkle! I would go 442 with Nani on the left and Anderson center with Carrick. Last year 442 did not work because we played Hernandez, who we all know can't do anything really with the ball. Welbeck is a better player who has everything, so it should work! It's a shame Nani is playing on the left because he is 10 times better on the right but he is the best we have got on the left, so has to go there.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3.67 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available