How the hell did Sturridge Get To Play

Hahaha typical arsenal fan. They always go on about how poor Walcott is then he scores 2 against tottenham and suddenly he's better than sturridge? Oh and defending Walcott by labeling sturridge as a 'headless chicken', oh the irony!

"I can see he's next on your list of hated players. Young you were right. Sturridge is good though "

Only a matter of time before you'll be saying that again. This time with Sturridge's name in there.

"Hahaha typical arsenal fan. They always go on about how poor Walcott is then he scores 2 against tottenham and suddenly he's better than sturridge? Oh and defending Walcott by labeling sturridge as a 'headless chicken', oh the irony!"

You don't get it.

Walcott's an headless chicken. But so is Sturridge. But the former headless chicken possesses searing pace. More so than the latter.

So the former will be more effective. Comprehende?

So the former will be more effective.

Even though Sturridge has more goals than Walcott this season....

And Sturridge has searing pace, just a tiny bit less than Walc'ock

Might have scored more goals this seasons.
But look back at the previous ones.

Just a tiny bit less?
You must be insane.
Not a chance

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Womb

Looking at previous seasons... ok.

Sturridge 114 appearences, 34 goals , 12 assists
Walcott 232 appearences, 44 goals, 39 assists.

I'd bet my house Sturridge willl have more goals and assists than Walcott when he reaches 232 appearences.

Walcotts played 118 more games and has 10 more goals and 27 more assists . That is truly laughable and should finally put a end to this pointless thread.

Hardly. Many of those appearances were as a younger player. You'd be better off taking the stats from when Sturridge had started playing (age wise) and compare it to Walcott that way.