or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 20 comments are related to an article called:

How the hell did Sturridge Get To Play

Page 1 of 1

posted on 29/2/12

The guy that got MOTM? Still he was better than Young

posted on 29/2/12

Anybody is better than Young

posted on 29/2/12

Could have been Theo who got injured playing for his country like we've had so many times with our players over the last few years. Im glad he didnt play long in a meaningless friendly

posted on 29/2/12

MOTM? You don't seriously take that seriously?

The guy's a headless chicken. Accept it.

posted on 29/2/12

I can see he's next on your list of hated players. Young you were right. Sturridge is good though

posted on 29/2/12

MOTM? You don't seriously take that seriously?

The guy's a headless chicken. Accept it.
--------

Yeah, but what do you think of Sturridge?

posted on 29/2/12

Walc'ock better than Sturridge judging by this delusion i'd say you was a undercover spurs fan posing as a arsenal fan.
Kalou is even better than Walcott

posted on 29/2/12

Wum

posted on 29/2/12

Sturridge is ok but too much of a ball-hog for my liking.

posted on 29/2/12

Sturridge is ok but too much of a ball-hog for my liking.

I agree, he needs to get rid of his selfishness and learn to pass more often

posted on 29/2/12

Hahaha typical arsenal fan. They always go on about how poor Walcott is then he scores 2 against tottenham and suddenly he's better than sturridge? Oh and defending Walcott by labeling sturridge as a 'headless chicken', oh the irony!

posted on 29/2/12

"I can see he's next on your list of hated players. Young you were right. Sturridge is good though "

Only a matter of time before you'll be saying that again. This time with Sturridge's name in there.

"Hahaha typical arsenal fan. They always go on about how poor Walcott is then he scores 2 against tottenham and suddenly he's better than sturridge? Oh and defending Walcott by labeling sturridge as a 'headless chicken', oh the irony!"

You don't get it.

Walcott's an headless chicken. But so is Sturridge. But the former headless chicken possesses searing pace. More so than the latter.

So the former will be more effective. Comprehende?

posted on 29/2/12

So the former will be more effective.

Even though Sturridge has more goals than Walcott this season....

posted on 29/2/12

And Sturridge has searing pace, just a tiny bit less than Walc'ock

posted on 29/2/12

Might have scored more goals this seasons.
But look back at the previous ones.

Just a tiny bit less?
You must be insane.
Not a chance

posted on 29/2/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 29/2/12

Womb

posted on 29/2/12

Looking at previous seasons... ok.

Sturridge 114 appearences, 34 goals , 12 assists
Walcott 232 appearences, 44 goals, 39 assists.

I'd bet my house Sturridge willl have more goals and assists than Walcott when he reaches 232 appearences.

posted on 29/2/12

Walcotts played 118 more games and has 10 more goals and 27 more assists . That is truly laughable and should finally put a end to this pointless thread.

posted on 1/3/12

Hardly. Many of those appearances were as a younger player. You'd be better off taking the stats from when Sturridge had started playing (age wise) and compare it to Walcott that way.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment