Isn't dembele crocked? Don't think he'll be back come summer. Seems a big risk though I guess if the price is right

Yup

Question - how can those who made the incorrect call, admit they made the wrong call, only for there top be nothing done?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The worst part is how the enjoyment and spontaneity of the game has been ruined. And if they're going to do that, at least get things right ffs

I've always been wary of 'review' type technology being introduced. In addition to how intrusive it is, we've yet to truly explore the slippery slope of what and how far back we check. Ugh.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
It's the same routine whenever one of the officials gets exposed for being incompetent. Superficial apology just to let things blow over. The whole association is more concerned with covering each other's backs than improving the consistency of their officiating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The biggest offender is this FA rule that if refs decide not to send someone off during the match, they can’t issue a retrospective ban. Because obviously referees would never get it wrong...even when DURING THE SAME GAME they admit exactly that.

I agree. I'd prefer the occasional mare to the game being ruined week in week out. Although maybe we're far removed enough from the last severely egregious reffing performance that my opinion has shifted

Watch Lo Celso help Spurs get at least one more point in the next 3 games than they otherwise would have achieved.

Npe I’m not sure about that. Feels like every week the refs screw up massively with or without assistance.

Given how useless VAR has become, I think it should only be used for offsides and maybe to spot violent conduct like the two in our past two games, where the ref is likely to miss the incident (as oppose to deem it not a foul).

And for offsides it should be without the microscopic lines they draw; if it’s not easy to tell in 1 minute what the correct decision is, benefit of doubt goes to attacker.

comment by soccerlol (U7650)
posted 53 minutes ago
In addition to how intrusive it is, we've yet to truly explore the slippery slope of what and how far back we check. Ugh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If its Chelsea, the match is your oyster.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Spurs board about to go on the offensive because Rudiger has said he feels let down.

comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs board about to go on the offensive because Rudiger has said he feels let down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Such a large collection of awful humans.

We should spurn them

This was something I was perfectly happy to live with, even if the odd call went against my team


It's not the odd call is it? It's one minimum per match lately.

I'd be okay with that WITHOUT VAR. To accept that with that tech is ridiculous imo.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator