Who gave me one star? They're ain't nothing wrong with this article.
Don't think i could think of any manager in the world who could achieve a similar feat. All the other top managers either work with massive budgets or inherited a team of superstars.
Fergie's cheap XI is better.
Schmmeicel - £500k
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
Beckham - free
Scholes - free
Keane - 3.7m
Giggs - free
Cantona - 1.2m
Ronaldo - 12mil
Total - £21mil (ish) and over half of that was C.Ronaldo
Im not going to harp on about how Fergie is the master at finding bargains because for every Nemanja Vidic, there's a Kleberson, Djemba x2, Veron, Bebe, Tiaibi etc
Fergie is impressive but I don't think they were really the best 11 players he bought in over his managerial time, whereas my list was.
e.g. Ferdinand and Rooney cost a lot and should probably be in there
Also most of those players were older and so the transfer market was of much less value,
Yeah was just about to add, fergie is only other manager. But even so he has had a lot of funds compared to wenger overall
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
!
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
I somehow don't think these are the best Man Utd players in their respective positions that Fergie has bought in!
For Ferguson's team surely you'd put ferdinand or vidic in CB. Then Rooney upfront, then instead of Beckham or Giggs put ronaldo in midfield. To make perhaps his best team. Therefore Would make it more expensive than arsenal. Wengers bargain team would beat that man u team.
Stil Ferguson's is not that bad. But Wenger's is better.
Dont be stupid people
Rooney over Cantona Ask United fans who they would deem Fergies's best striekrs were and not many would have Rooney.
Also, Neville and Irwin are our 2 best full backs over the last 2 decades. Did any of you even watch Bruce and Pallister, they were on par with Vidic and Ferdinand as a partnership.
Admittedly, you could stick Vidic in there, even then, he only cost £7mil
Smalling_Jones' team is spot on, and arguably as good as Wenger's team. Only 4 players might have a say on getting in that team and that's Rio, Vidic, Stam and Parker. Even the, Bruce and Pallister was a phenominal partnership. Rooney wouldn't get near a best Ferguson 11.
Still Fergie has had a lot longer. Also Man Utd, go away. This is an appreciation of Arsenal. How much success do you need before you stop trouncing on everyone else's!
Sorry, I saw the article and was going to comment, then saw Smalling_Jones' one and thought I'd give my opinion on that, and then forgot about the OP.
Credit to Wenger, he really has found some gems. It's shame he hasn't been able to find as many recently - that's not a dig at him or Arsenal by the way, just an observation of his transfers.
If you were to merge the 2 teams, Id say there'll be mroe United players than Arsenal ones
Here's mine, money no option, and based on what would make the best partnerships accross the pitch:
Schmeichel
Neville Rio Vidic Cole
Ronaldo Scholes Keane Pires
Bergkamp Henry
Bergamp, Henry, Pires and Cashley were unstoppable down that left wing. Neville, Rio and Vidic are less attacking and would allow Ronaldo more freedom. Scholes and Keane speaks for itself as a midfield duo, and Schmeichel is one of the greatest ever.
If we are talking TRANSFERS surely players promoted through the youth academy shouldn't count? Just an observation.
Both good teams
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
Wasnt Bruce in old money? How many shillings is that?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Wenger's Cheap Dream Team
Page 1 of 1
posted on 26/4/12
Who gave me one star? They're ain't nothing wrong with this article.
posted on 26/4/12
Wenger
posted on 26/4/12
Don't think i could think of any manager in the world who could achieve a similar feat. All the other top managers either work with massive budgets or inherited a team of superstars.
posted on 26/4/12
A levels suck.
posted on 26/4/12
Fergie's cheap XI is better.
Schmmeicel - £500k
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
Beckham - free
Scholes - free
Keane - 3.7m
Giggs - free
Cantona - 1.2m
Ronaldo - 12mil
Total - £21mil (ish) and over half of that was C.Ronaldo
Im not going to harp on about how Fergie is the master at finding bargains because for every Nemanja Vidic, there's a Kleberson, Djemba x2, Veron, Bebe, Tiaibi etc
posted on 26/4/12
posted on 26/4/12
Fergie is impressive but I don't think they were really the best 11 players he bought in over his managerial time, whereas my list was.
e.g. Ferdinand and Rooney cost a lot and should probably be in there
Also most of those players were older and so the transfer market was of much less value,
posted on 26/4/12
Yeah was just about to add, fergie is only other manager. But even so he has had a lot of funds compared to wenger overall
posted on 26/4/12
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
!
posted on 26/4/12
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
I somehow don't think these are the best Man Utd players in their respective positions that Fergie has bought in!
posted on 26/4/12
For Ferguson's team surely you'd put ferdinand or vidic in CB. Then Rooney upfront, then instead of Beckham or Giggs put ronaldo in midfield. To make perhaps his best team. Therefore Would make it more expensive than arsenal. Wengers bargain team would beat that man u team.
Stil Ferguson's is not that bad. But Wenger's is better.
posted on 26/4/12
Dont be stupid people
Rooney over Cantona Ask United fans who they would deem Fergies's best striekrs were and not many would have Rooney.
Also, Neville and Irwin are our 2 best full backs over the last 2 decades. Did any of you even watch Bruce and Pallister, they were on par with Vidic and Ferdinand as a partnership.
Admittedly, you could stick Vidic in there, even then, he only cost £7mil
posted on 26/4/12
Smalling_Jones' team is spot on, and arguably as good as Wenger's team. Only 4 players might have a say on getting in that team and that's Rio, Vidic, Stam and Parker. Even the, Bruce and Pallister was a phenominal partnership. Rooney wouldn't get near a best Ferguson 11.
posted on 26/4/12
Still Fergie has had a lot longer. Also Man Utd, go away. This is an appreciation of Arsenal. How much success do you need before you stop trouncing on everyone else's!
posted on 26/4/12
Sorry, I saw the article and was going to comment, then saw Smalling_Jones' one and thought I'd give my opinion on that, and then forgot about the OP.
Credit to Wenger, he really has found some gems. It's shame he hasn't been able to find as many recently - that's not a dig at him or Arsenal by the way, just an observation of his transfers.
posted on 26/4/12
If you were to merge the 2 teams, Id say there'll be mroe United players than Arsenal ones
posted on 26/4/12
Here's mine, money no option, and based on what would make the best partnerships accross the pitch:
Schmeichel
Neville Rio Vidic Cole
Ronaldo Scholes Keane Pires
Bergkamp Henry
Bergamp, Henry, Pires and Cashley were unstoppable down that left wing. Neville, Rio and Vidic are less attacking and would allow Ronaldo more freedom. Scholes and Keane speaks for itself as a midfield duo, and Schmeichel is one of the greatest ever.
posted on 26/4/12
If we are talking TRANSFERS surely players promoted through the youth academy shouldn't count? Just an observation.
Both good teams
posted on 26/4/12
Neville - free
Bruce - 800k
Pallister - 2.3m
Irwin - 600k
---------------------------
Wasnt Bruce in old money? How many shillings is that?
Page 1 of 1