They are showing City - QPR on Sky Sports 1 and Sunderland - United on Sky Sports 2

Sunderland v Utd

what a load of bolloks!!! I know it's the title but it's hardly like City are going to slip up

sure they will go to all the games as goals go in

USA have all the games on yet we get screwed watch Utd Sunderland.

I know i can understand them playing the city game as that also involves a relegation battle but United v Sunderland What a boring game that is. They should be fair and atleast put on 1 champions league decider game aswell.

I think it's absolutely scandalous. Not because i wanna see the spurs game but surely the Bolton Stoke game is absolutely huge. The United game is inconsequential if City win theirs, so just show that one. It's completely absurd. Give something to the smaller clubs for once. Fuçking joke!!!

Newcastle Everton would be a good one to watch.

Should be

City game and arsenal game

stop crying don you little baby your going to end up 3rd

I'm not crying prankster, i just think its unfair. Not everything ivolves around the manchester teams anyway, i hope you're right

of course man u v Sunderland is on they still have a chance of winning the league

Evolves *

I agree don should show city game and another theres plenty other big games going on

I agree with fridgeboy. They shouldn't show the utd game. Either the Bolton game or arsenal or spurs. Ideally they'd have 4 games on all 4 channels. More important than god damn teleshopping or rugby league highlights or whatever/

but they could both win the title

anyways west brom away you could see the g!mps losing

Would love it if newcastle snatched 4th as well

I.wish

What 4 games would you have on then?

It's simple logic. Choose one from the top and another from the bottom.... please Carol.

Obviously Sky will show both the Manchester clubs games.
City you imagine will beat QPR but what if they don't? And United win? Sky don't want to be caught with their pants down.

Fridgeboy wouldn't city qpr game cover both top n bottom?

Whilst it's entirely reasonable to show both games - I don't see much of a match in ManU-Sunderland. Sunderland have nothing to play for, and they always roll over for their parent team anyway. ManC will beat QPR, but that's more to do with QPR being pretty awful and ManC owning half the best players in the world.

Don

The PL is a competition first and foremost. The winners should be shown and see the trophy presented

1. City
2. United
3. Arsenal
4. Chelsea

18. Bolton
19. Blackburn
20. Wolves

you won't be saying all this when United win 15-0 and clinch the league on goal difference. It has taken years of careful planning to sneak 8 of our players into their side.

Whilst it's entirely reasonable to show both games - I don't see much of a match in ManU-Sunderland. Sunderland have nothing to play for, and they always roll over for their parent team anyway. ManC will beat QPR, but that's more to do with QPR being pretty awful and ManC owning half the best players in the world.
------------------------------------------------------------------
how do you know they will beat QPR? did you know City woudl Beat Man Utd 6-2 and Man Utd would beat arsenal 8-2? or that Swansea would beat Man City?

"how do you know they will beat QPR?"

That was in the second part of the sentence - you've even quoted it. It said "but that's more to do with QPR being pretty awful and ManC owning half the best players in the world"

"did you know City woudl Beat Man Utd 6-2 and Man Utd would beat arsenal 8-2? or that Swansea would beat Man City?"

Yes. I did know all those things, I wrote down each result, along with goalscorers, and placed it in a sealed envelope. Completely true, ask anyone.