or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 40 comments are related to an article called:

Clint Dempsey

Page 2 of 2

posted on 28/8/12

I get what you are saying, but it is hard on your wide players to maintain that kind of energy over a long season.

Swansea did fall off a fair bit from about mid march onwards.

------------

That's why we have Suarez, Borini, Downing, Sterling, Assaidi & potentially Dempsey to play in them positions...

posted on 28/8/12

iCRAFT

You could call it a 4-3-3 but you could also call it a 4-5-1, with the wide players pushing forward when you attack, and cutting in like you say.

United only played this 4-3-3 for one season when we had Tevez, Rooney and Ronaldo. None of them really had any defensive duties though.

posted on 28/8/12

The champions drew, away @the 8th best team in England. They scored from our mistakes and virtually no ability of their own.

............

Irrelevant to your formation.

posted on 28/8/12

That's why i believe another forward is necassary VC.

We could potentially have Suarez, Dempsey, Borini, Downing, Assaidi and Sterling competeing for 3 places, very good competition for places.

posted on 28/8/12

Irrelevant to your formation.

-------

It's really not.

The way we played and they way Rodgers set out the team to play - including our formation - contributed to City not being able to score through merit and forced them to live off of the mistakes we made.

Either way you look at it. If you only count legit goals - I don't count set-pieces as such - then it would have been 0-0.

We still drew to the best team in the Prem'.

comment by Jason G (U8621)

posted on 28/8/12

Dempsey is a Liverpool player. Deal to be announced soon!

posted on 28/8/12

A question. Who would you rather have up front, Dempsey or Ramirez. My choice is for the latter,he's younger fitter, faster. jimmyTheRed

posted on 28/8/12

comment by iCraft uGraft - Believable Tekkers (U1193)
posted 1 minute ago
Irrelevant to your formation.

-------

It's really not.

.............

Yes it is.

Or is this form,ation a one off for when you play City?

......................

We still drew to the best team in the Prem'

........................

But you lost to a vastly inferior one a week earlier.

posted on 28/8/12

>>Dempsey is a Liverpool player. Deal to be announced soon!

I'd be happy

posted on 28/8/12

Say's who rJG?

posted on 28/8/12

Lucas

Who do you see as your midfield three.

posted on 28/8/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 28/8/12

Don't want that greedy Mercenary at the club. Don't want Gaston Ramirez at all.

posted on 28/8/12

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)

posted 21 minutes ago

Lucas

Who do you see as your midfield three.
------------------------------------------------------------
Are current best 3 is Lucas, Allen and Gerrard but if Sahin can keep fit and adapt quickly he can give any 3 of them a run for their money.

Dempsey could also play at the top of the 3.

Shelvey and Henderson aren't too bad neither.

Quick question VC, how does Anderson still get into your starting 11?
He's woeful.

posted on 28/8/12

Yes it is.

Or is this form,ation a one off for when you play City?

___________

What are you going on about?

This comment is how it started:

">>Do you think you could compete against the top teams with a midfield three.

seemed to work just fine against city

........................

You drew the game, at home. You scored from a corner and another set piece."

That implies that you don't think the result against City means we can play with 2 wide-forwards...

I then went on to say that neither of their goals were scored due to our alleged inability to play with wide-forwards and were conceded due to out mistakes.

Thus meaning that the formation we played managed to keep the best team in the Premiership from scoring. (In essence)

How you managed to formulate what I said into whatever you thought I said I have no idea.

Page 2 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment