Id take De Jong over Mikel at Chelsea. Quality midfield enforcer.
If Essien goes you will be relying on Mikel
Not too happy about de Jong going, although it's not finalised yet (either the deal or the fee (which is likely to be low because he's in the last year of his contract)).
Essien doesnt play much anyway for us mate. Sad to see his decline. He was world class 2-3 years ago. Now he's too bulky and too slow.. Was one of my favorite players.
Sir Alex just said he's not certain Berbatov will be going to Fulham, and he won't be surprised if Spurs sign him
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
City didn't want to deal with his agent Kia the cockwobbler so as he's in the last year of his contract we weren't likely to get much more for him from abroad
He owes us nothing
Id take De Jong over Mikel at Chelsea. Quality midfield enforcer.
But we wouldn't strengthen a rival,rather take a hit on the fee than do an arsenal
We would deal with tottingham though
Please no Eissien. The guys is seriously washed up
are they just w&nkers thou...or....
BUS W&NKERS......
De Jong is quality, can't believe clubs were't queuing up for him.
VDV going. Don't worry, Sigurdsson's just as good
I'd have liked De Jong at United, but why would the top 4 clubs show interest when they know City won't sell to them?
I'd have liked De Jong at United, but why would the top 4 clubs show interest when they know City won't sell to them?
-------------
We sold to them so y wouldnt they sell to us ?
I fking well hope we're not in for Essien. Past his best and struggles with injuries. No thanks.
Because they're not that stupid BO$$
I'd be alright with Essien, class is permanent.
Essien is stil only 29.. I dont get to see him play that often to make a proper long term judgement about whether he's stil got it or not. He plays one or two games every few months but when he does play he does look way too bulky and slow.
I don't want Essien near the club, and why the hell should we settle for washed-up players? Amazing how far our expectations have fallen.
Essien would be a poor signing.
breaking on the beeb...dempsey to villa....WTF...
Villa have bid accepted for dempsey!
Sign in if you want to comment
Live:Deadline Day Thread - closed!!!
Page 7 of 58
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 31/8/12
Id take De Jong over Mikel at Chelsea. Quality midfield enforcer.
posted on 31/8/12
If Essien goes you will be relying on Mikel
posted on 31/8/12
Mikel>De Jong>Essien
posted on 31/8/12
Not too happy about de Jong going, although it's not finalised yet (either the deal or the fee (which is likely to be low because he's in the last year of his contract)).
posted on 31/8/12
Essien doesnt play much anyway for us mate. Sad to see his decline. He was world class 2-3 years ago. Now he's too bulky and too slow.. Was one of my favorite players.
posted on 31/8/12
Sir Alex just said he's not certain Berbatov will be going to Fulham, and he won't be surprised if Spurs sign him
posted on 31/8/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/8/12
City didn't want to deal with his agent Kia the cockwobbler so as he's in the last year of his contract we weren't likely to get much more for him from abroad
He owes us nothing
posted on 31/8/12
Sir Alex = Master WUM
posted on 31/8/12
Id take De Jong over Mikel at Chelsea. Quality midfield enforcer.
But we wouldn't strengthen a rival,rather take a hit on the fee than do an arsenal
We would deal with tottingham though
posted on 31/8/12
RDV leaving the Spurs
posted on 31/8/12
Please no Eissien. The guys is seriously washed up
posted on 31/8/12
are they just w&nkers thou...or....
BUS W&NKERS......
posted on 31/8/12
posted on 31/8/12
De Jong is quality, can't believe clubs were't queuing up for him.
posted on 31/8/12
VDV going. Don't worry, Sigurdsson's just as good
posted on 31/8/12
I'd have liked De Jong at United, but why would the top 4 clubs show interest when they know City won't sell to them?
posted on 31/8/12
I'd have liked De Jong at United, but why would the top 4 clubs show interest when they know City won't sell to them?
-------------
We sold to them so y wouldnt they sell to us ?
posted on 31/8/12
I fking well hope we're not in for Essien. Past his best and struggles with injuries. No thanks.
posted on 31/8/12
Because they're not that stupid BO$$
posted on 31/8/12
I'd be alright with Essien, class is permanent.
posted on 31/8/12
Essien is stil only 29.. I dont get to see him play that often to make a proper long term judgement about whether he's stil got it or not. He plays one or two games every few months but when he does play he does look way too bulky and slow.
posted on 31/8/12
I don't want Essien near the club, and why the hell should we settle for washed-up players? Amazing how far our expectations have fallen.
Essien would be a poor signing.
posted on 31/8/12
breaking on the beeb...dempsey to villa....WTF...
posted on 31/8/12
Villa have bid accepted for dempsey!
Page 7 of 58
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12