Podolski giroud chamakh and maybe walcott may play up front?
But we have the fantastic clinical striker called Gervinho
Strikers of late has always been our Achilles heel. I honesty don't know what wenger is thinking with this one
I can’t believe Wenger actually thinks this current team is good enough, we want to win trophies but with this team, only thing we are winning is top4
If we don't bring in a midfielder I am going to be furious
This is a joke. We arnt getting anyone.
Facking unreal
Poldolski- not favourite position
Giroud- unproven
Chamakh- less said the better
Walcott - be very surprised if AW plays him there
It can only be because Wenger is going to give Walcott a shot up front. Which would make us weak out wide.
...we want to win trophies but with this team, only thing we are winning is top4
And even that is in serious doubt.
at the moment, it looks like nobody is coming
Hmniv - we are not signing anyone
Sorry wenger you can't replace song with diaby, we need a midfielder
Its a very very dangerous game which has about 30% chance of succeeding. Fact is neither of the strikers we brought in have any experience of the physicality, intensity (game after game without a break) or adjusting to the defenders quickly.
Its ridiculous we didn't bring in a top class attacker to compliment what we have.
Last season:
RVP
Chamakh
Park
This season
Giroud
Podolski
Chamakh
How is this LESS options?
Our first choice last season was better, granted. but our second and third choice this season are surely better
I really don't blame RVP. At least he was honest back in July, Wenger and co have been lying to us all along.
Feck the lot of them
Worrying this is we don't even have goal scoring midfielders
An injury to Giroud will see Chamakh take his place
Fack sake
At least you have others who could play there. We only have Suarez and Borini.
It's obvious Walcott will finally be given his chance up front, (apparently his contract wrangles weren't all about money).
Hey I'm not big fan, but maybe Chamakh will rediscover his form now that van Persie isn't around?
Yep, I'm clutching at straws with that, but I think there will be a lot of that going on behind the scenes, 'til January at least.
And then Henry will return!
Fair enough if diaby and coquelin both come good but you can't take that risk, can't stress enough how much we need a midfielder
I laughed at Liverpool for paying 5 million for Sahin on a loan deal.
Doesnt seem that bad now does it?
Sign in if you want to comment
Someone explain........
Page 1 of 3
posted on 31/8/12
Podolski giroud chamakh and maybe walcott may play up front?
posted on 31/8/12
But we have the fantastic clinical striker called Gervinho
posted on 31/8/12
Strikers of late has always been our Achilles heel. I honesty don't know what wenger is thinking with this one
posted on 31/8/12
I can’t believe Wenger actually thinks this current team is good enough, we want to win trophies but with this team, only thing we are winning is top4
posted on 31/8/12
And Arshawin
posted on 31/8/12
If we don't bring in a midfielder I am going to be furious
posted on 31/8/12
This is a joke. We arnt getting anyone.
Facking unreal
posted on 31/8/12
Poldolski- not favourite position
Giroud- unproven
Chamakh- less said the better
Walcott - be very surprised if AW plays him there
posted on 31/8/12
It can only be because Wenger is going to give Walcott a shot up front. Which would make us weak out wide.
posted on 31/8/12
...we want to win trophies but with this team, only thing we are winning is top4
And even that is in serious doubt.
posted on 31/8/12
at the moment, it looks like nobody is coming
posted on 31/8/12
How far we've fallen
posted on 31/8/12
Hmniv - we are not signing anyone
posted on 31/8/12
Sorry wenger you can't replace song with diaby, we need a midfielder
posted on 31/8/12
Its a very very dangerous game which has about 30% chance of succeeding. Fact is neither of the strikers we brought in have any experience of the physicality, intensity (game after game without a break) or adjusting to the defenders quickly.
Its ridiculous we didn't bring in a top class attacker to compliment what we have.
posted on 31/8/12
Last season:
RVP
Chamakh
Park
This season
Giroud
Podolski
Chamakh
How is this LESS options?
Our first choice last season was better, granted. but our second and third choice this season are surely better
posted on 31/8/12
I really don't blame RVP. At least he was honest back in July, Wenger and co have been lying to us all along.
Feck the lot of them
posted on 31/8/12
In Arsene We Trust
posted on 31/8/12
Worrying this is we don't even have goal scoring midfielders
posted on 31/8/12
An injury to Giroud will see Chamakh take his place
Fack sake
posted on 31/8/12
In Arsen We Doubt
posted on 31/8/12
At least you have others who could play there. We only have Suarez and Borini.
posted on 31/8/12
It's obvious Walcott will finally be given his chance up front, (apparently his contract wrangles weren't all about money).
Hey I'm not big fan, but maybe Chamakh will rediscover his form now that van Persie isn't around?
Yep, I'm clutching at straws with that, but I think there will be a lot of that going on behind the scenes, 'til January at least.
And then Henry will return!
posted on 31/8/12
Fair enough if diaby and coquelin both come good but you can't take that risk, can't stress enough how much we need a midfielder
posted on 31/8/12
I laughed at Liverpool for paying 5 million for Sahin on a loan deal.
Doesnt seem that bad now does it?
Page 1 of 3