carlos, who said he was offered a contract extension?
YEP interview with Grayson yesterday said it looks unlikely he'll be offered an extension.
Carlos
If he can get it else where, why wouldnt you ask for it at Leeds ?????
Seem sensible really
Liw, precisely. I have no problem with that. he didn't need to declare his love thats all.
Jonty, leeds have been on talks with him since the end of the season. Hes exercising his right to ask for big money and leeds are refusing. Exactly like bj.
You dont pay the going rate, you aint gunna keep or sign the better players
Not the same as BJ carlos.
BJ got offered a contract, but turned it down, Gradel hasn't been offered one.
I agree, I also agree with keeping a strict wage cap. If we hadn't we would have killa, bj, ks and gradel on massive wages and still looking to improve the squad.
How do you know he hasn't? Same as bj same as ks same as killa same as beckford
Carlos
I dont believe in wage caps, and dont think they work.
I believe in paying the right players the right money.
Carlos, because in all other cases you mentioned club like to tell us how the player has been ofered a contract but turned it down.
Jonty, you will here the same about gradel too, if and when he leave.
Liw, like I said before, if we didn't have a wage cap we would have killa, bj, beckford, gradel and ks all on big wages. Ask yourself if they would carry us forward next year?
Jonty, maybe he hasnt been offered an official contract.
But negotiations have clearly taken place, otherwise how would they know his agent wants 25k?
Come on, negotiations dont work like ebay!
They have obviously discussed a new contract, and Gradels agent has said he want 25k
To which leeds have said there is no way we can offer that, probably said the higest we can go to is less than half of it.
To which the agent has gone forget it.
And so there was no point offering the contract?
Does that sound more realistic?
Not realistic. Thats what has happened.
carlos, club announced teh contracts in becks and BJ's case whilst players were still at club.
Faith, how do you know agent has asked Leeds for 25k per week?
Have Leeds said this?
Has Gradel said this?
How do you know?
How do you know that Leeds haven't said
'Max we need the money and you;re our most saleable asset right now. We're not going to offer you a new contract but help you fulfill your ambitions by playing at a Prem club'
carlos, do you have any inside knowledge here?
Yes. Enough to say that all the deals mentioned involved the players agents getting deals done and then going back to leeds with a basic ultimatum. Apart from ks who agreed to see out his contract before leeds decided to cash in.
If money was the issue, why not sell snoddy?
carlos, with respect to money/snoddy, maybe the club feels there is more they can get and are holding out for more.
Re Gradel, the onlky info I have heard is that people have been told that Max's agent wants 25k per week.
That may or may not be true, but who would leak this info, certainly not Max.
This means that either Leeds are undermining the negotiations and the 25k may or may not be true.
If it is true I would agree that it is greedy and maybe Max is getting bad advice, but as so many say on here we have to wait and see on this one.
It could just as easily be a case of Leeds wanting to cash in on Max.
If you say you have some inside knowledge on Max I'm happy to respect that.
I dont think it is greedy if he genuinely can get that money. Not many would do otherwise. He just didn't need to be naive enough to state he loved the club.
I like the way leeds are handling it though tbh. I don't like the way our squad is right now but things have been difficult this closed season, not least by our stance on wages. That said I'm confident we will improve squad wise on last year.
We can't be prudent and have an expensive team.
I like my job and the company I work for and I'm sure they'd miss me but if someone offered to more than double my wages I'd be gone like a shot!!!
greed re 25k depends on where he's starting from I guess.
Nothing naive about saying you love the clube if you do indeed love the club.
I don't take a lot of notice of those throwaway quotes especially when situations outside of one's control can change.
I do understand what you are saying Jonty.
It could be true, but I dont think it realistically is.
I know you doint like the way the lcub is run, and I can definitely understand some frustrations there.
You are dismissing a lot of news to justify your point though, and all of this is the news that is more positive towards the club.
Why wouldnt gradel and his agent have denied the claims he has asked fro 25k a week if it wasn't true?
Why would the club make that up? Surely that would put off bidders and lower his valuation as an asset, which you say leeds are trying to force out of the club to make money from?
Just because Leeds have a stricter wage policy and transfer policy than you would like, does not mean they are trying to ruin the club
Faith, what 'news' am I dismissing?
I've seen one or 2 tweets re 25k then lots of discusion in forums regurgitating those quotes.
I've seen no news about 25k, if that was what you're alluding to.
The club are great at claiming to do business behind closed doors and then changing the rules when they want to.
Remember Bates going public re Bradley Johnson who then had to defend himself publicly?
I don't trust Bates at all which is why I try and read between teh lines with most things the club puts out.
I'm not saying thatteh scenario you raised isn't correct, just saying how do you know.
Why would the club make that up?
----------------------------------------------------------
Where have the club said what he wanted ?????
Just because Leeds have a stricter wage policy and transfer policy
--------------------------------------------------------------------
But say they never get turned down for a player
Not a single person on here can point at official proof of what the wage structure is at Leeds or what a player is earning so it's all speculation really.
liw, the club hasnt, but that was in response to Jonty saying it must have come from the club, as gradels side wouldnt let it out.
But we have seen info from sources of the 25k, you dont believe this to be true, but why isnt gradel denying it then?
If I was to believe the Leeds side of the story it adds up and makes sense.
If i try and believe your side where its a theory that leeds are lying about the whole situation and really just want to force him out of the club....it seems to have plenty of flaws.
Faith, I don't know if the scenario put to you is the case at all, just trying to highlight the fact that we don't know much about the situation.
Maybe Gradel doesn't want to get into a war of words, who knows, I know Beckford didn't want to get involved in teh mud slinging, it sounded from Johnson interviews that he didn't either.
But do you really think it would have been one of Max's team that leaked anything about 25k?
We just have to wait and see on this one.
Sign in if you want to comment
Gradel
Page 2 of 3
posted on 19/7/11
carlos, who said he was offered a contract extension?
YEP interview with Grayson yesterday said it looks unlikely he'll be offered an extension.
posted on 19/7/11
Carlos
If he can get it else where, why wouldnt you ask for it at Leeds ?????
Seem sensible really
posted on 19/7/11
Liw, precisely. I have no problem with that. he didn't need to declare his love thats all.
Jonty, leeds have been on talks with him since the end of the season. Hes exercising his right to ask for big money and leeds are refusing. Exactly like bj.
posted on 19/7/11
You dont pay the going rate, you aint gunna keep or sign the better players
posted on 19/7/11
Not the same as BJ carlos.
BJ got offered a contract, but turned it down, Gradel hasn't been offered one.
posted on 19/7/11
I agree, I also agree with keeping a strict wage cap. If we hadn't we would have killa, bj, ks and gradel on massive wages and still looking to improve the squad.
posted on 19/7/11
How do you know he hasn't? Same as bj same as ks same as killa same as beckford
posted on 19/7/11
Carlos
I dont believe in wage caps, and dont think they work.
I believe in paying the right players the right money.
posted on 19/7/11
Carlos, because in all other cases you mentioned club like to tell us how the player has been ofered a contract but turned it down.
posted on 19/7/11
Jonty, you will here the same about gradel too, if and when he leave.
Liw, like I said before, if we didn't have a wage cap we would have killa, bj, beckford, gradel and ks all on big wages. Ask yourself if they would carry us forward next year?
posted on 19/7/11
Jonty, maybe he hasnt been offered an official contract.
But negotiations have clearly taken place, otherwise how would they know his agent wants 25k?
Come on, negotiations dont work like ebay!
They have obviously discussed a new contract, and Gradels agent has said he want 25k
To which leeds have said there is no way we can offer that, probably said the higest we can go to is less than half of it.
To which the agent has gone forget it.
And so there was no point offering the contract?
Does that sound more realistic?
posted on 19/7/11
Not realistic. Thats what has happened.
posted on 19/7/11
carlos, club announced teh contracts in becks and BJ's case whilst players were still at club.
Faith, how do you know agent has asked Leeds for 25k per week?
Have Leeds said this?
Has Gradel said this?
How do you know?
How do you know that Leeds haven't said
'Max we need the money and you;re our most saleable asset right now. We're not going to offer you a new contract but help you fulfill your ambitions by playing at a Prem club'
posted on 19/7/11
carlos, do you have any inside knowledge here?
posted on 19/7/11
Yes. Enough to say that all the deals mentioned involved the players agents getting deals done and then going back to leeds with a basic ultimatum. Apart from ks who agreed to see out his contract before leeds decided to cash in.
If money was the issue, why not sell snoddy?
posted on 19/7/11
carlos, with respect to money/snoddy, maybe the club feels there is more they can get and are holding out for more.
Re Gradel, the onlky info I have heard is that people have been told that Max's agent wants 25k per week.
That may or may not be true, but who would leak this info, certainly not Max.
This means that either Leeds are undermining the negotiations and the 25k may or may not be true.
If it is true I would agree that it is greedy and maybe Max is getting bad advice, but as so many say on here we have to wait and see on this one.
It could just as easily be a case of Leeds wanting to cash in on Max.
If you say you have some inside knowledge on Max I'm happy to respect that.
posted on 19/7/11
I dont think it is greedy if he genuinely can get that money. Not many would do otherwise. He just didn't need to be naive enough to state he loved the club.
I like the way leeds are handling it though tbh. I don't like the way our squad is right now but things have been difficult this closed season, not least by our stance on wages. That said I'm confident we will improve squad wise on last year.
We can't be prudent and have an expensive team.
posted on 19/7/11
I like my job and the company I work for and I'm sure they'd miss me but if someone offered to more than double my wages I'd be gone like a shot!!!
posted on 19/7/11
greed re 25k depends on where he's starting from I guess.
Nothing naive about saying you love the clube if you do indeed love the club.
I don't take a lot of notice of those throwaway quotes especially when situations outside of one's control can change.
posted on 19/7/11
I do understand what you are saying Jonty.
It could be true, but I dont think it realistically is.
I know you doint like the way the lcub is run, and I can definitely understand some frustrations there.
You are dismissing a lot of news to justify your point though, and all of this is the news that is more positive towards the club.
Why wouldnt gradel and his agent have denied the claims he has asked fro 25k a week if it wasn't true?
Why would the club make that up? Surely that would put off bidders and lower his valuation as an asset, which you say leeds are trying to force out of the club to make money from?
Just because Leeds have a stricter wage policy and transfer policy than you would like, does not mean they are trying to ruin the club
posted on 19/7/11
Faith, what 'news' am I dismissing?
I've seen one or 2 tweets re 25k then lots of discusion in forums regurgitating those quotes.
I've seen no news about 25k, if that was what you're alluding to.
The club are great at claiming to do business behind closed doors and then changing the rules when they want to.
Remember Bates going public re Bradley Johnson who then had to defend himself publicly?
I don't trust Bates at all which is why I try and read between teh lines with most things the club puts out.
I'm not saying thatteh scenario you raised isn't correct, just saying how do you know.
posted on 19/7/11
Why would the club make that up?
----------------------------------------------------------
Where have the club said what he wanted ?????
Just because Leeds have a stricter wage policy and transfer policy
--------------------------------------------------------------------
But say they never get turned down for a player
posted on 19/7/11
Not a single person on here can point at official proof of what the wage structure is at Leeds or what a player is earning so it's all speculation really.
posted on 19/7/11
liw, the club hasnt, but that was in response to Jonty saying it must have come from the club, as gradels side wouldnt let it out.
But we have seen info from sources of the 25k, you dont believe this to be true, but why isnt gradel denying it then?
If I was to believe the Leeds side of the story it adds up and makes sense.
If i try and believe your side where its a theory that leeds are lying about the whole situation and really just want to force him out of the club....it seems to have plenty of flaws.
posted on 19/7/11
Faith, I don't know if the scenario put to you is the case at all, just trying to highlight the fact that we don't know much about the situation.
Maybe Gradel doesn't want to get into a war of words, who knows, I know Beckford didn't want to get involved in teh mud slinging, it sounded from Johnson interviews that he didn't either.
But do you really think it would have been one of Max's team that leaked anything about 25k?
We just have to wait and see on this one.
Page 2 of 3