England have a poor pool of talent. Most of the defenders seem average, Midfielders are mostly lightweight and poor defensively. Good dribblers though. Attack is the only strong point, lots of players who are good on the ball and very fast.
Nathan Redmond is probably my favourite player to use. Benik Afobe is good as well, then you've got the usual suspects like Walcott, Sturridge and Welbeck. I've dropped Rooney because his stats are poor now.
World class Walcott. What season are you in?
I tend to start in season 1
Hoping Max Clayton will be a good signing. Been waiting for 2 years to complete this deal.
might start one with real betis, just for joel campbell.
but i love vela more
Can't you just recall Campbell for Arsenal?
I think he's permanently at Betis, he's still there in my second season
Nah, stupid fifa doesn't have the capacity to send him back.
Stoke are actually really good on FIFA. Abuse the strength and height.
Stoke are $hit in my game, sold Begovic and left themselves with a 53 rated player in goal. Fulham are down in the Championship despite having an 87 rated CB worth about £25m in their ranks.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sold Dyer to Milan for 22.5M. Used that money to sign Lamela from Roma for 7.5M. But I now have a bit of an dilemma on who to sign next: Bale or Pedro? Had offers for both accepted so it's just down to who. So, who would be better?
Dyer? You Swansea? What was him and Lamela's ratings? Bale for the Welsh connection, Pedro for sexy 5* weak foot.
Yeah, midway through season 3 with them in 2nd place behind City. Lamela's rating was only 80 compared to Dyer's 85 but Lamela is four years younger I believe. Bale's stats look better than Pedro's so that edges me towards him.
Bale, more complete stats. Pedro will just have better finishing but Lamela will be a bigger goal threat than Dyer
Spurs STILL have no 'keeper and after getting promoted they have 1 point from 9 games. I guess when they're not in the same league as you the fact they have no 'keeper doesn't affect them.
Depends what system you're playing and what position you're looking for. Bale LM, Pedro LW.
Depends on how they've grown but take a look at Jese and Deulofeu. Both quality young wingers with pace and 4* skills in my second season. I play Jese in the middle as he has good passing, acceleration is better than sprint speed and great control.
Decided to go for Bale. Excited to use him. Sorry Pedro.
Sign in if you want to comment
Official FIFA 15 Career Mode Thread
Page 107 of 282
108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112
posted on 9/3/13
England have a poor pool of talent. Most of the defenders seem average, Midfielders are mostly lightweight and poor defensively. Good dribblers though. Attack is the only strong point, lots of players who are good on the ball and very fast.
Nathan Redmond is probably my favourite player to use. Benik Afobe is good as well, then you've got the usual suspects like Walcott, Sturridge and Welbeck. I've dropped Rooney because his stats are poor now.
posted on 9/3/13
World class Walcott. What season are you in?
posted on 9/3/13
Starting season 7.
posted on 9/3/13
I tend to start in season 1
posted on 9/3/13
Yes John.
posted on 9/3/13
Thanks
posted on 9/3/13
Hoping Max Clayton will be a good signing. Been waiting for 2 years to complete this deal.
posted on 9/3/13
might start one with real betis, just for joel campbell.
but i love vela more
posted on 9/3/13
Can't you just recall Campbell for Arsenal?
posted on 9/3/13
I think he's permanently at Betis, he's still there in my second season
posted on 9/3/13
Nah, stupid fifa doesn't have the capacity to send him back.
posted on 9/3/13
Boo.
posted on 9/3/13
Super Draxler
posted on 9/3/13
Fufu.
posted on 9/3/13
Stoke are actually really good on FIFA. Abuse the strength and height.
posted on 9/3/13
Stoke are $hit in my game, sold Begovic and left themselves with a 53 rated player in goal. Fulham are down in the Championship despite having an 87 rated CB worth about £25m in their ranks.
posted on 9/3/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/13
Sold Dyer to Milan for 22.5M. Used that money to sign Lamela from Roma for 7.5M. But I now have a bit of an dilemma on who to sign next: Bale or Pedro? Had offers for both accepted so it's just down to who. So, who would be better?
posted on 10/3/13
Dyer? You Swansea? What was him and Lamela's ratings? Bale for the Welsh connection, Pedro for sexy 5* weak foot.
posted on 10/3/13
Yeah, midway through season 3 with them in 2nd place behind City. Lamela's rating was only 80 compared to Dyer's 85 but Lamela is four years younger I believe. Bale's stats look better than Pedro's so that edges me towards him.
posted on 10/3/13
Who is cheaper?
posted on 10/3/13
Pedro by 5M.
posted on 10/3/13
Bale, more complete stats. Pedro will just have better finishing but Lamela will be a bigger goal threat than Dyer
Spurs STILL have no 'keeper and after getting promoted they have 1 point from 9 games. I guess when they're not in the same league as you the fact they have no 'keeper doesn't affect them.
posted on 10/3/13
Depends what system you're playing and what position you're looking for. Bale LM, Pedro LW.
Depends on how they've grown but take a look at Jese and Deulofeu. Both quality young wingers with pace and 4* skills in my second season. I play Jese in the middle as he has good passing, acceleration is better than sprint speed and great control.
posted on 10/3/13
Decided to go for Bale. Excited to use him. Sorry Pedro.
Page 107 of 282
108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112