Having read through these posts I have came to the conclusion that this person vee-jay is nothing more than a fool who would be better ignored, keep taking the drugs vee-jay, in fact take more than you need and do everyone a favour.

Barab I took part in the thread mate. i'd prefer to think he/she is just at the wind up but if not ....................

Dont think this clown is at the wind up, just a bitter and twisted fool who wouldn't recognise talent if it was right in front of him, which it is. I just wish he would be honest and tell everyone why he has this hatred towards Murray, if he cant do that then just shut up and go back to his padded cell where he belongs.

he even resorted to the old paraguay top thing again. him and tim henman have explained that joke time and time again but hey don't let the truth get in the way of a good old grudge eh

The paraguay shirt that was never worn....

don't know too much about Tennis, I have to admit, but here goes:

Isn't Andy Murrey 24 or 25 ish? - he is half way through his career? - he has time to win more doesn't he?

Also, IMO, (only from watching limited tennis, I have to admit) but Murrey would of been around 15 years ago, rather than today, he'd of won loads more

Also, IMO, (only from watching limited tennis, I have to admit) but Murrey would of been around 15 years ago, rather than today, he'd of won loads more
.........................................................................
Um, imho, YES! But certain people are a bit touchy on that subject

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I think Agassi and Sampras in this era would have been good!Not sure how Sampras would cope now with the great returners of the game being able to get balls back in play alot easier than they used too? Im sure Murray would have schooled them both

am I right in thinking Murrey is a good returner of the ball?

One of the best.

The best Suppose you have to include "Lungs" in that

Logie, what I can gather, could be very wrong here, but Murrey seems to give away unforced errors, more than Nadal, or Feds... is that the main reason they are a class apart?

Federer, off form, makes more unforced errors than Murray. Infact, as a more attacking player I would imagine Federer generally makes more unforced errors, however, makes more winners, volleys and aces etc.

As baseline specialists, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic are as reliable as you can get when it comes to rallying from the baseline.

Fed makes a lot of UEs due to small size of racquet head, you either hit winners or UEs with that racquet.

Wow..you guys really kept my thread going...
Well done!!
I guess it still left a sour taste in some peoples mouths...and then you call me bitter

The only person with a sour taste in their mouth is you, away back to your carers and ask them to increase your medication.
Vee-jay =

I rest my case

vee rather than take the high road with your attitude why not contemplate why a bunch of people you don't know take exception to your comments?

in your mind you're right and everyone else is wrong eh?

sad really

Because youre Murray fans? Duh!!!
Would any of you really say anything to the contrary,Murray cannot be criticised on this forum,thats a disgrace to freedom of speech
We have discussed quite a few subjects on this thread and no one has refuted anything I have said...why not?

all you did was criticise, the rest of us don't create threads berating other players.

is praise such a hard thing for you. a boy from a small nation who plays the game with such finesse wins a gold and a slam and it sticks in your throad

please answer why that is?

no doubt you'd pick on my type so throat.

Well done to Murray...a comprehensive dismantling...and some say its a hard thing for me to give credit where credit is due

@ Polbethian...I dont think Murray plays the game with finesse,I would associate someone like Gasquet or Federer with finesse
A few comments ago on this very thread you were referring to Murray as British...now he is a boy from a small nation?