Has to be the wettest name ever. Couldn't stand him for that reason alone.
His name is pretty suspect tbh.
He was my favourite Bulls player when growing up. Yes, over MJ and Rodman.
I always loathed the Bulls. Magic Johnson for me. Could spend hours watching Hakeem too.
Hakeem was such a graceful player. That being said, MJ is MJ.
I'm a sucker for style over substance.
i'm a sucker for style over substance.
=================
And MJ had both.
So as a Madridista, in tennis you must find your fellow Madridista - Nadal - a bore? At least when compared to the swan-like Swiss Maestro?
You won't wind me up with that. I find tennis in general pretty boring. As it goes, I'll root for Nadal purely because he's Spanish, but he certainly doesn't play the most appealing tennis. Federer's is light years better to watch.
MJ's basketball wasn't graceful in my eyes.
Haha
Well, i am an avid tennis fan and yes, Nadal can be so-so. I am a tennis purist and hanker for the days of Johnny Mac, Borg, Edberg with all their contrasting styles as opposed to the baseline moonballers of nowadays.
But i have to commend Rafa's mental strength, it is second to none.
Edberg was wonderful to watch. My memories stretch back to MacEnroe and Borg, but admittedly I was only about 10 years old. Mecir was another I enjoyed watching.
As a casual fan, I think tennis would be a better game
if wooden frames were compulsory.
Well, that is just one of the putative changes but if ear it is mainly for nostalgic reason.
Wooden rackets (or at least smaller ones), smaller, lighter balls, faster courts (this really bugs me, the non-clay courts have really become so slow that the grass of Wimby seems to be similar to the courts of Roland Garros) etc
Anyhow, one can only dream...
Whoa, this turned into quite the tennis talk...
I loved Hakeem too IOAG. Magic? Eh, not so much.
Now Stockton Stockton > Magic in terms of pure passing.
Not nostalgia, but to take the emphasis off power. I appreciate it takes different skills to control the ball in today's game, but it just doesn't appeal to me that much.
Regarding the slower courts, I do find it striking to see Ferrer holding his own on the supposedly faster courts. But I think he's on something.
Well, i don't watch Bball as much as i used to be in the 90s.
And current characters are hard to like: Kobe ( just too much drama), Le Bron (arrogance personified, Christiano Ronaldo of Bball and member of the Miami 3 that are practising financial doping in Bball )? Durant? kevin Rose
None of these guys are particularly likeable - respected and admired? Sure. But any of this current as loveable as say Iversen?
Re Tennis:
Yes, Ferrer has really impressed me - especially this year. And in Tennis terms, he is an old player but he just had his best year on tour and is finally showing promise of an all-court player.
His dismantling of the Berdych serve in the Davis cup was interesting to watch. The thing is Ferrer is such an athlete, never gets injured, puts in 100% in every game.
A bit like Nadal but with less weapons.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nah, the first two dont have much of a case. They're more on par with MJ than Pippen.
Payton has a good case but I'd give the edge to Pippen. Scottie could guard the 1-4 positions and even some undersized centers like Alonzo Mourning. Pip is one of the most athletically gifted players ever and he could put players like Magic Johnson off their game. Payton lacks the versatility and athletic body that Pip possesses.
Saint, looks like you were spot on regarding D'Antoni & Gasol.
Where d'you reckon he might be heading?
IOAG:
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/story/_/id/8719587/los-angeles-lakers-rebuffing-trade-inquiries-pau-gasol
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Scottie Pippen
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/11/12
Has to be the wettest name ever. Couldn't stand him for that reason alone.
posted on 21/11/12
His name is pretty suspect tbh.
He was my favourite Bulls player when growing up. Yes, over MJ and Rodman.
posted on 21/11/12
I always loathed the Bulls. Magic Johnson for me. Could spend hours watching Hakeem too.
posted on 21/11/12
Hakeem was such a graceful player. That being said, MJ is MJ.
posted on 21/11/12
I'm a sucker for style over substance.
posted on 21/11/12
i'm a sucker for style over substance.
=================
And MJ had both.
So as a Madridista, in tennis you must find your fellow Madridista - Nadal - a bore? At least when compared to the swan-like Swiss Maestro?
posted on 21/11/12
You won't wind me up with that. I find tennis in general pretty boring. As it goes, I'll root for Nadal purely because he's Spanish, but he certainly doesn't play the most appealing tennis. Federer's is light years better to watch.
MJ's basketball wasn't graceful in my eyes.
posted on 21/11/12
Haha
Well, i am an avid tennis fan and yes, Nadal can be so-so. I am a tennis purist and hanker for the days of Johnny Mac, Borg, Edberg with all their contrasting styles as opposed to the baseline moonballers of nowadays.
But i have to commend Rafa's mental strength, it is second to none.
posted on 21/11/12
Edberg was wonderful to watch. My memories stretch back to MacEnroe and Borg, but admittedly I was only about 10 years old. Mecir was another I enjoyed watching.
As a casual fan, I think tennis would be a better game
if wooden frames were compulsory.
posted on 21/11/12
Well, that is just one of the putative changes but if ear it is mainly for nostalgic reason.
Wooden rackets (or at least smaller ones), smaller, lighter balls, faster courts (this really bugs me, the non-clay courts have really become so slow that the grass of Wimby seems to be similar to the courts of Roland Garros) etc
Anyhow, one can only dream...
posted on 21/11/12
Whoa, this turned into quite the tennis talk...
I loved Hakeem too IOAG. Magic? Eh, not so much.
Now Stockton Stockton > Magic in terms of pure passing.
posted on 21/11/12
Not nostalgia, but to take the emphasis off power. I appreciate it takes different skills to control the ball in today's game, but it just doesn't appeal to me that much.
Regarding the slower courts, I do find it striking to see Ferrer holding his own on the supposedly faster courts. But I think he's on something.
posted on 21/11/12
Well, i don't watch Bball as much as i used to be in the 90s.
And current characters are hard to like: Kobe ( just too much drama), Le Bron (arrogance personified, Christiano Ronaldo of Bball and member of the Miami 3 that are practising financial doping in Bball )? Durant? kevin Rose
None of these guys are particularly likeable - respected and admired? Sure. But any of this current as loveable as say Iversen?
posted on 21/11/12
Re Tennis:
Yes, Ferrer has really impressed me - especially this year. And in Tennis terms, he is an old player but he just had his best year on tour and is finally showing promise of an all-court player.
His dismantling of the Berdych serve in the Davis cup was interesting to watch. The thing is Ferrer is such an athlete, never gets injured, puts in 100% in every game.
A bit like Nadal but with less weapons.
posted on 24/11/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/11/12
Nah, the first two dont have much of a case. They're more on par with MJ than Pippen.
Payton has a good case but I'd give the edge to Pippen. Scottie could guard the 1-4 positions and even some undersized centers like Alonzo Mourning. Pip is one of the most athletically gifted players ever and he could put players like Magic Johnson off their game. Payton lacks the versatility and athletic body that Pip possesses.
posted on 25/11/12
Saint, looks like you were spot on regarding D'Antoni & Gasol.
Where d'you reckon he might be heading?
posted on 6/12/12
IOAG:
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/story/_/id/8719587/los-angeles-lakers-rebuffing-trade-inquiries-pau-gasol
Page 1 of 1