Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted 2 minutes ago
Gazza, word of advice, DON'T WUM METRO. He takes it personally.
......
Hmmm, strange response. Don't take anything personally on here.
Ask the admins, i complain about no comments and have never used filter options.
You don't like the fact that i brought up history in a thread which conveniently.... Is about history.
Plus, its tagged on our board so how dare i bring up our sensational history
The only ppl getting personal are the ones referring to european bans
I'm a little disappointed in you there TP
Metro, so that isn't part of Liverpools history?
Greatness does not have to be humble. That's such a moralistic take.
Oh so talking about history is getting personal now?
strange ideas you have about what constitutes history
And there was me thinking History was about the Romans, Henry the 8th, The Spanish Armarda and the Gunpowder Plot - my mistake - just goes to show how wrong you can be!
And I won't mention the fact that Chelsea won a major European Trophy 2 years before Liverpool!!
Metro,
From past experience, i know how a vastly different opinion from yr own can wind you up. I was actually gunna debate with you about your comments on Liverpool's patch of dominance being so how better than United's or Madrid's but thought better of it.
It's obvious to me that most of the contributors to this post lack a bit of history themselves. Clearly too young to remember the likes of Osgood, Hutchinson, the great Charlie Cooke, Hollins, Harris etc.
Chelsea, along with most clubs, have a rich history. Maybe a little research by the morons who think otherwise, may be in order.
I was actually gunna debate with you about your comments on Liverpool's patch of dominance being so how better than United's or Madrid's but thought better of it.
--------------------------------------
TP...........me too and decided agst it for the same reasons as you did
we do in fact hold the record for biggest ground attendance against dynamo moscow i believe in the 50s with an attendance coming close to 90.000 supporters at stamford bridge.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1946 - Attendance actually believed to be around 120,000!
120,000
Giving out powdered egg
Biggish, hang on. We were about to agree on sumthin?
hear hear giddddybbiddy!
Thankyou brummie for putting that little bit of history right!
TP........ironically agreeing not to argue
No worries ifarka
If my facts are correct they had to shut the gates at between 90 - 100,000 but thousands more managed to gain illegal access to the ground and the final figure was estimated at about 120,000!
Also of note Chelsea still hold the highest aggregate score in European competition dating back to 1972, beating Jeneussee Hautcharage (excuse spelling) 21-0, 13 - 0 at home and 0 - 8 away!
Ffcking deluded Scousers!
Brummie........during that game agst Jeneusse our fans were singing are you Tottenham in disguise
No TP, you've always hated my superior knowledge. That's got nothing to do with taking things personally.
That's life. I know more about football than you and Liverpool will always be bigger than Chelsea
Now please stop getting wound up lads. Can't we all just get along. Can't help the fact tha we are a footballing juggernaut
That would have made Shandy's face look like
Laters Biggish - the gym beckons
footballing juggernaut
--------------------------------------------
Shame - fooking big crash that was
Andy Carroll looks like a long distance driver
Shame - fooking big crash that was
....
Not really. It was always going to plateau and then dip when football became about the rich.
The fact that we still have managed to collect
4 league cups
3 Fa cups
2 super cups
Uefa cup
European cup
In an apparent 'baren' spell amidst all the new takeovers means its probably the most successul baren spell in footballing history
You took my last comment about taking things personally, personally
To talk seriously for a moment. A big difference between Liverpool and Chelsea fans is we appreciate the history of LFC, it's incredibly rich. I'm not talking about the stereotypical plastic definition of history Liverpool's fans waffle on about, meaning most trophies in a club existence (what a shallow way to judge a club by), real history can never be erased that easily.... e.g. United taking only 21 years to overhaul Liverpool's top flight record.
Things like CFC being the first footballing organisation to be portrayed in cinema, first team to wear squad numbers on our shirts, first English club to qualify for European competition (though we had to withdraw), being the only club to win the top division in both the 50th and 100th years of existence, participating in the last old Wembley and the first new Wembley finals - winning both matches, etc... that's genuine tradition, breakthroughs into society and established pieces of record which won't EVER be erased
When Liverpool fans speak about history in the context they do, they're abusing the term and doing themselves and their club a disservice by identifying their clubs as nothing more than a spent force.
Sign in if you want to comment
HAVE CHELSEA NOW 'GOT' SOME HISTORY?
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 4/12/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/12/12
posted 2 minutes ago
Gazza, word of advice, DON'T WUM METRO. He takes it personally.
......
Hmmm, strange response. Don't take anything personally on here.
Ask the admins, i complain about no comments and have never used filter options.
You don't like the fact that i brought up history in a thread which conveniently.... Is about history.
posted on 4/12/12
Plus, its tagged on our board so how dare i bring up our sensational history
The only ppl getting personal are the ones referring to european bans
I'm a little disappointed in you there TP
posted on 4/12/12
Metro, so that isn't part of Liverpools history?
posted on 4/12/12
Greatness does not have to be humble. That's such a moralistic take.
posted on 4/12/12
Oh so talking about history is getting personal now?
strange ideas you have about what constitutes history
posted on 4/12/12
And there was me thinking History was about the Romans, Henry the 8th, The Spanish Armarda and the Gunpowder Plot - my mistake - just goes to show how wrong you can be!
And I won't mention the fact that Chelsea won a major European Trophy 2 years before Liverpool!!
posted on 4/12/12
Metro,
From past experience, i know how a vastly different opinion from yr own can wind you up. I was actually gunna debate with you about your comments on Liverpool's patch of dominance being so how better than United's or Madrid's but thought better of it.
posted on 4/12/12
It's obvious to me that most of the contributors to this post lack a bit of history themselves. Clearly too young to remember the likes of Osgood, Hutchinson, the great Charlie Cooke, Hollins, Harris etc.
Chelsea, along with most clubs, have a rich history. Maybe a little research by the morons who think otherwise, may be in order.
posted on 4/12/12
*somehow
posted on 4/12/12
I was actually gunna debate with you about your comments on Liverpool's patch of dominance being so how better than United's or Madrid's but thought better of it.
--------------------------------------
TP...........me too and decided agst it for the same reasons as you did
posted on 4/12/12
we do in fact hold the record for biggest ground attendance against dynamo moscow i believe in the 50s with an attendance coming close to 90.000 supporters at stamford bridge.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1946 - Attendance actually believed to be around 120,000!
posted on 4/12/12
120,000
Giving out powdered egg
posted on 4/12/12
Biggish, hang on. We were about to agree on sumthin?
posted on 4/12/12
hear hear giddddybbiddy!
Thankyou brummie for putting that little bit of history right!
posted on 4/12/12
TP........ironically agreeing not to argue
posted on 4/12/12
No worries ifarka
If my facts are correct they had to shut the gates at between 90 - 100,000 but thousands more managed to gain illegal access to the ground and the final figure was estimated at about 120,000!
Also of note Chelsea still hold the highest aggregate score in European competition dating back to 1972, beating Jeneussee Hautcharage (excuse spelling) 21-0, 13 - 0 at home and 0 - 8 away!
posted on 4/12/12
Ffcking deluded Scousers!
posted on 4/12/12
Brummie........during that game agst Jeneusse our fans were singing are you Tottenham in disguise
posted on 4/12/12
No TP, you've always hated my superior knowledge. That's got nothing to do with taking things personally.
That's life. I know more about football than you and Liverpool will always be bigger than Chelsea
Now please stop getting wound up lads. Can't we all just get along. Can't help the fact tha we are a footballing juggernaut
posted on 4/12/12
That would have made Shandy's face look like
Laters Biggish - the gym beckons
posted on 4/12/12
footballing juggernaut
--------------------------------------------
Shame - fooking big crash that was
posted on 4/12/12
Andy Carroll looks like a long distance driver
posted on 4/12/12
Shame - fooking big crash that was
....
Not really. It was always going to plateau and then dip when football became about the rich.
The fact that we still have managed to collect
4 league cups
3 Fa cups
2 super cups
Uefa cup
European cup
In an apparent 'baren' spell amidst all the new takeovers means its probably the most successul baren spell in footballing history
posted on 4/12/12
You took my last comment about taking things personally, personally
To talk seriously for a moment. A big difference between Liverpool and Chelsea fans is we appreciate the history of LFC, it's incredibly rich. I'm not talking about the stereotypical plastic definition of history Liverpool's fans waffle on about, meaning most trophies in a club existence (what a shallow way to judge a club by), real history can never be erased that easily.... e.g. United taking only 21 years to overhaul Liverpool's top flight record.
Things like CFC being the first footballing organisation to be portrayed in cinema, first team to wear squad numbers on our shirts, first English club to qualify for European competition (though we had to withdraw), being the only club to win the top division in both the 50th and 100th years of existence, participating in the last old Wembley and the first new Wembley finals - winning both matches, etc... that's genuine tradition, breakthroughs into society and established pieces of record which won't EVER be erased
When Liverpool fans speak about history in the context they do, they're abusing the term and doing themselves and their club a disservice by identifying their clubs as nothing more than a spent force.
Page 2 of 6
6