Holtby has shown huge lack of ambiiton by joining Spurs. We don't need these kind of players anyway
When we are linked with him, he's not good enough.
When Spurs sign him, Wenger's lost the plot because we have missed out on one of our targets.
Get a grip.
Although he wouldn't be a starter for us. He'd still be a good option when Rosicky leaves and if Ramsey still falls flat. Doubt he would have been that expensive too.
-
he was free. 67k a week. facking steal for spurs.
Rotation is a fine thing, but it's not worth paying 60k p week for someone whose going to be on the bench half the time. We've got enough of them as it is!
So when SSN reported it its true and all finalised
We were saying the same about Chamakh....
Rotation is a fine thing, but it's not worth paying 60k p week for someone whose going to be on the bench half the time. We've got enough of them as it is!
-
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
GT, Spurs confirmed it on their website
Is everyone forgetting the key point in all this?
Is he even any good at football?
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
---------------------------------------------------------
Holtby would be a truly awful defensive midfielder. Rather play Fabianski there
Holtby would be a truly awful defensive midfielder. Rather play Fabianski there
-
he played there alot last season.
he was free. 67k a week. facking steal for spurs.
---------------------
Very much doubt he was free, Schalke wouldn't let him leave for free now, unless Spurs have signed a pre-contract deal with him.
Anyway, he's a decent player but no more. We all complain about paying our deadwood too much so would we really want a squad player on £70k a week for a position in which we need a completely different type of player?
Why on earth would we play him in Arteta's position?
And your right, we already do pay people just to sit on the bench, and it's a mistake that we're doing it, so why sign someone else to do it?
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
================================
Please tell me you are kiddin'......right?!
Not bothered tbh, not really seen a lot of him and we need players now rather than the summer
He was free Bestie, but he joins in July
Kent I hate your guts u kuntt
Holtby played a bit of DM last season. Plays as an AM this season. Can also play wide. Remember when we played Nasri at DM?
£0m Holtby
Not true Kent.
http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/lewis-holtby/englaender-bieten-ueber-4-mio-euro-gehalt-27946702.bild.html
he played there alot last season.
----------------------------------------------------------
Not really, he played in an Arteta role a couple of times, and hasn't played there at all this season, so can't have been very good!
Priorities lie elsewhere, why would we need a player who will be 3rd choice at best in his position? We need an actual defensive midfielder before signing players in other areas.
He will be free as he's joining spurs in the summer
Very much doubt he was free, Schalke wouldn't let him leave for free now, unless Spurs have signed a pre-contract deal with him.
-
pre contract.
Anyway, he's a decent player but no more. We all complain about paying our deadwood too much so would we really want a squad player on £70k a week for a position in which we need a completely different type of player?
-
depth FFS. he would rotate with wilshere, cazorla and arteta.
Why on earth would we play him in Arteta's position?
-
because he played there loads last season
And your right, we already do pay people just to sit on the bench, and it's a mistake that we're doing it, so why sign someone else to do it?
-
because he wouldnt just sit on the bench. hed actually play, alot.
Holtby played a bit of DM last season. Plays as an AM this season. Can also play wide. Remember when we played Nasri at DM?
-
someone knows all you complaining about me saying we could play him as DM and you know nothing about him.
Cheers GT, Google Translate has cleared this up for me:
"Claiming to be the "Spurs" make the transfer fee summer exchange of international's soon clear.
The package of the Premier League clubs should look like: an annual salary of 3.5 million pounds (about 4.3 million euros), plus a signing bonus of 500,000 pounds (about 615,000 euros).
Holtby now says "Yes" to Spurs?
At Schalke he said "No"! A contract extension burst in December after six months' poker. Noack and Holtby called until 6, then still 5 million euros a year ."
Sign in if you want to comment
HOLTBY
Page 3 of 6
6
posted on 4/1/13
Holtby has shown huge lack of ambiiton by joining Spurs. We don't need these kind of players anyway
posted on 4/1/13
When we are linked with him, he's not good enough.
When Spurs sign him, Wenger's lost the plot because we have missed out on one of our targets.
Get a grip.
posted on 4/1/13
Although he wouldn't be a starter for us. He'd still be a good option when Rosicky leaves and if Ramsey still falls flat. Doubt he would have been that expensive too.
-
he was free. 67k a week. facking steal for spurs.
posted on 4/1/13
Rotation is a fine thing, but it's not worth paying 60k p week for someone whose going to be on the bench half the time. We've got enough of them as it is!
posted on 4/1/13
So when SSN reported it its true and all finalised
posted on 4/1/13
We were saying the same about Chamakh....
posted on 4/1/13
Rotation is a fine thing, but it's not worth paying 60k p week for someone whose going to be on the bench half the time. We've got enough of them as it is!
-
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
posted on 4/1/13
GT, Spurs confirmed it on their website
posted on 4/1/13
Is everyone forgetting the key point in all this?
Is he even any good at football?
posted on 4/1/13
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
---------------------------------------------------------
Holtby would be a truly awful defensive midfielder. Rather play Fabianski there
posted on 4/1/13
Holtby would be a truly awful defensive midfielder. Rather play Fabianski there
-
he played there alot last season.
posted on 4/1/13
£0m Holtby
posted on 4/1/13
he was free. 67k a week. facking steal for spurs.
---------------------
Very much doubt he was free, Schalke wouldn't let him leave for free now, unless Spurs have signed a pre-contract deal with him.
Anyway, he's a decent player but no more. We all complain about paying our deadwood too much so would we really want a squad player on £70k a week for a position in which we need a completely different type of player?
posted on 4/1/13
Why on earth would we play him in Arteta's position?
And your right, we already do pay people just to sit on the bench, and it's a mistake that we're doing it, so why sign someone else to do it?
posted on 4/1/13
we are already paying our bench players at least 60k a week and they dont play, why not pay it to someone that would play regularly. id even satrt him > arteta.
================================
Please tell me you are kiddin'......right?!
posted on 4/1/13
Not bothered tbh, not really seen a lot of him and we need players now rather than the summer
posted on 4/1/13
He was free Bestie, but he joins in July
posted on 4/1/13
Kent I hate your guts u kuntt
Holtby played a bit of DM last season. Plays as an AM this season. Can also play wide. Remember when we played Nasri at DM?
posted on 4/1/13
£0m Holtby
Not true Kent.
http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/lewis-holtby/englaender-bieten-ueber-4-mio-euro-gehalt-27946702.bild.html
posted on 4/1/13
he played there alot last season.
----------------------------------------------------------
Not really, he played in an Arteta role a couple of times, and hasn't played there at all this season, so can't have been very good!
posted on 4/1/13
Priorities lie elsewhere, why would we need a player who will be 3rd choice at best in his position? We need an actual defensive midfielder before signing players in other areas.
posted on 4/1/13
He will be free as he's joining spurs in the summer
posted on 4/1/13
Very much doubt he was free, Schalke wouldn't let him leave for free now, unless Spurs have signed a pre-contract deal with him.
-
pre contract.
Anyway, he's a decent player but no more. We all complain about paying our deadwood too much so would we really want a squad player on £70k a week for a position in which we need a completely different type of player?
-
depth FFS. he would rotate with wilshere, cazorla and arteta.
Why on earth would we play him in Arteta's position?
-
because he played there loads last season
And your right, we already do pay people just to sit on the bench, and it's a mistake that we're doing it, so why sign someone else to do it?
-
because he wouldnt just sit on the bench. hed actually play, alot.
posted on 4/1/13
Holtby played a bit of DM last season. Plays as an AM this season. Can also play wide. Remember when we played Nasri at DM?
-
someone knows all you complaining about me saying we could play him as DM and you know nothing about him.
posted on 4/1/13
Cheers GT, Google Translate has cleared this up for me:
"Claiming to be the "Spurs" make the transfer fee summer exchange of international's soon clear.
The package of the Premier League clubs should look like: an annual salary of 3.5 million pounds (about 4.3 million euros), plus a signing bonus of 500,000 pounds (about 615,000 euros).
Holtby now says "Yes" to Spurs?
At Schalke he said "No"! A contract extension burst in December after six months' poker. Noack and Holtby called until 6, then still 5 million euros a year ."
Page 3 of 6
6