your a dirty plactic flag waving glory hunter. and dont try to associate yourselves with utds achivements by calling yourself a prawn sandwich eater. you havent earned that either

of course they did. i never once stated that. man utd are the worst for it.
plus its about time mr chelsea actually spoke for himself (however lame it may be) instead of hiding behind npe77 comments.

npe's my guardian on here

ebwearethepeople, what are we arguing about

just trying to get my day in mr chelsea

your a dirty plactic flag waving glory hunter.

------------------------------------------------------
On when hand you say Chelsea have nothing to be proud of and no history then you say plactic flag waving glory hunter.. surely if there is no glory to hunt?!

your a dirty plactic flag waving glory hunter. and dont try to associate yourselves with utds achivements by calling yourself a prawn sandwich eater. you havent earned that either

-

Right, I may disagree with the other liverpool fan commenting, but atleast I can see he has some intelligence.

However, scrootie is just thick (I blame the centuries of Merseyside inbreeding). Chelsea have enjoyed more success in the last 15 years, with or without money than Liverpool.

And in your history you spent big, like any other team who has been succesful post war (Forest, Villa, Derby, Leeds, Arsenal. Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and now City).

However, scrootie is just thick

---------------------------------------

And judging by his handle has boogers on his balls.

I don't see what Liverpool can be proud of...

1) In the 80s when they were succesful, their fans were violent mobs (Juventus-Liverpool for example).
2) Gerrard and Carroll are talismen who are criminals.
3) Their football cathedral is an obsolete shack.
4) They have never won the Premier Leaague.
5) Their manager is an alcoholic.

But yeah, lets get out or old Betamaxes and watch the Liverpool of yesteryear.

Cos what happened in 1983 makes Liverpool worthy of praise to this day (NOT!)

again your boasts dont date back to before 2003. why are you the only supporters who do this?

Before Roman came, we finished above you in the league and got into the CL as you were dumped into fifth place.

In 1999, we finished 3 points off Utd's ttreble winnig side in the league.

Between 1997-2000, we won six trophies.

Thats all before June 2003, when Roman took over.

And you spent huge in the 80s to get your success.

so chelsea were est in 1997. is finishing above us your stepping stone for reaching ''BIG CLUB'' status?

And judging by his handle has boogers on his balls.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

No its just proof that calling us nothing before RA came backfired on you. As we finished above you the season before.

Meanwhile, you still have failed to respnd to any points I have made and keep churning out the 'you have no history' line.

Not really interested. And bid goodday, and will leave MrChelsea to fend for himself. Sorry mate.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

so you actually want us to speak about our history? you really need to make up your mind. est in 1892 as supposed to chelsea's 1997 or 2003 or what other date you finished above us. in reguard to our support. Liverpool is one of the best supported teams in the world despite the length of time we have went without a league trophy. we as fans are admired the world over. we were voted best fans in europe for 2005 despite the ''destruction'' we have left in previous years. and most importantly we as a club have won 18 league titles and 5 european cups. come back when you achieve that tally