Ruind by Arsenal

*ruined.

But seriously he played well today, just never really got a good run at Arsenal after a promising start. Just didn't work out for him, Giroud is a better fit

Both Giroud and Chamakh are poor.

Terrible hair.

"But seriously he played well today, just never really got a good run at Arsenal after a promising start. Just didn't work out for him"

___________________

A scouse that supports arsenal ?

Chamakh was doing a good job when he first started at Arsenal. He was scoring a few goals and putting in a decent shift, then RV came back from injury and he was dropped

A scouse that supports arsenal ?

You mustnt support Arsenal to come to this conclusion

Exactly Fubo. He was never that bad people on here made of him.

He was getting ruined by a lot of folk (talksport were up to their old tricks funnily enough) at halftime during that game.

Don't get me wrong, his Arsenal days are done, but he showed enough in what I saw to say he gave the Irons a decent option up top. With gametime, I catually think he'd do a decent job at Wst Ham.

Chamakh defenders are rather clueless individuals. It's like you think he could be the starting striker for us. Newsflash, he's $hit, he wasn't even good yesterday.

Chamakh is bad at scoring goals, which is a problem for a striker.

Agree with 8bit...people always mention his hold up play and his lack of luck... He is a striker and therefore his main role is to score goals . He does not get in to the right positions enough and often takes the wrong option. Hence , he does not score enough.

I'm not going out of my way to defend him. From memory, he's been garbage for Arsenal. But he's clearly a confidence player. His first 6 months at Arsenal where he hit the ground running, he was superb, full of goals and a great link player.

In the first 45 minutes at Upton Park yesterday he was creating mayhem in the QPR penalty are, West Ham should have had 2 or 3 goals.

I'll stand by it, IF he starts for West Ham, in time, he could be useful for them...

When he was playing regularly he was scoring regularly. After RVP came back from injury he only played in a weaker team so I personally wont judge his performances.

Even if he played well in one of those games he never got rewarded.

When RVP left he should have been given more of a chance. He had to watch Gervinho tried up front in some games in which he was not even in the squad.

I still say AW knows best but it is not fair for the fans to disrespect an Arsenal man who has given %110 and showed more loyalty than most others.

Full of goals?!

He scored seven goals for crying out loud. He's poor, very poor.

Also why isn't he at the African Cup of Nations? Isn't he Moroccan? We have a player who barely gets a game for us, who scored for Morocco, yet Chamakh can't even get in the side.

Poor poor player.
Giroud is a lot better than him and that's saying something.

Chamakh is a brilliant player, played well yesterday and will prove everyone he is one of the best forwards in the world now

chamakh has moved from one crap team to another

west ham for the drop

Spurs supporters are seriously silly

why did you loan out chamakh? now you are stuck with girpoo up top, and theo who you are giving 100k a week too.

plus a 3 mill signing on fee... he already plays for you but you gave him 3 mill signing on fee hahaha.

you mugs.

he and his agent have done wenger up like a kipper

You are a fee

ok choice ok.

Chronic the hedgehog why dont you go and collect some rings and jump on things

choice i think you need to go and have a lie down.

Unfortunately, Allardyce plays just one striker at a time. So Chamakh will have to compete with Cole, Maiga and carthorse Carroll.
I doubt he'll get more than 5 starts.

I am going to build an igloo and lock you inside with me and have a heart to heart and some hot drinks