Rangers are the same club. FACT
Celtic are less successful than a team in the 4th Tier, suck it up.
In the eyes of many fans its not the same team thats the main thing
Boring! mate you really need to give up.
Even the decent Celtic supporters on here must be sick and tired of this keech!
Even the SPL statement yesterday confirmed Rangers are the same club, run by a new company (newco).
So many Celtic fans keep going on about us yet claim we're a different club from their former rivals.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
"comment by Wieghorst67 (U12621)
posted 8 seconds ago
In the eyes of many fans its not the same team thats the main thing"
=============================
Actually doesnt matter a jot. Only the truth matters. The truth is that we have kept our history.
The truth is what matters and every single authority recognises Rangers have kept their history.
Plenty of folk believe the earth is only a few thousand years old, no matter what the experts all tell them.
Anyone that thinks Rangers are a New Club are as stupid as the flat earth believers.
Things just wont be the same in my eyes and plenty other fans i know, its the liquidation thing, just giving you my opinion
Weighorst, your opinions dont mean anything though, the rest of us deal in facts.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
your in the fourth teir and dont affect celtic anymore thats the FACTS and because you cannot compete or challenge Celtic this means your status as rivals has been removed in my mind
Rangers are the same club. FACT
No they are not fact
Even the SPL statement yesterday confirmed Rangers are the same club
6 players were registered to an spl club, when that club was dissolved they became free agents. If green owned the right to RFC the club then the SFA could not allow the players registered with them to leave without punishment.
Every rangers player has been re-registered with the SFA under a different Club, much the same way as the ones that left have registered with another club.
So why comment?
No need to answer we all know its because you are raging that we are still more successful than you.
You can have your own opinion but you can't have your own facts.
Im not raging one bit i have nothing to be raging about - im commenting on an article on the Celtic board with my opinions, thats what a forum is about??
Same mind numbing, boring pash, words in a different order.
Lee McCulloch has a legal length of service greater than a year which would be impossible if his old business did not exist. He transferred with yhe ecconomic entity which is the club.
What part of that fact do you dispute?
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Anyway back to the question in hand
The only thing this new club has to offer any less of, to the SPL is HISTORY!
Rangers have the same SFA membership the club has always had, for around 140 years. Only the company running the club is new.
The more some Celtic fans keep going on about us, the more they prove we're the same club as before.
Littlebit,
Why cant you answer my question?
The only thing this new club has to offer any less of, to the SPL is HISTORY!
-----
No, they are quite happy to hoover up the TV revenue we generate. The thieving cants.
It's the Irn Bru badge on the side of the strips
Rangers have the same SFA membership the club has always had, for around 140 years. Only the company running the club is new.
Why did they need to reapply for SFA membership, sorry but that Govan Blue was not hibernating it was as dead as a Norwegian Blue in a monty pyton pet shop.
"Why did they need to reapply for SFA membership, sorry but that Govan Blue was not hibernating it was as dead as a Norwegian Blue in a monty pyton pet shop."
==============================
Because you have to apply to have it switched between legal entities.
Celtic had theirs moved in 1994, does that mean Celtic are a new club?
Now answer my question.
How does McCulloch legally have a LOS greater than the age of the company. This can only happen when there is a continuation of the economic entity (the club). So how has he managed it without the club continuing as it would be a legal first!
Sign in if you want to comment
What does The The Rangers football Club
Page 1 of 3
posted on 1/2/13
Rangers are the same club. FACT
Celtic are less successful than a team in the 4th Tier, suck it up.
posted on 1/2/13
In the eyes of many fans its not the same team thats the main thing
posted on 1/2/13
Boring! mate you really need to give up.
Even the decent Celtic supporters on here must be sick and tired of this keech!
posted on 1/2/13
Even the SPL statement yesterday confirmed Rangers are the same club, run by a new company (newco).
So many Celtic fans keep going on about us yet claim we're a different club from their former rivals.
posted on 1/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/2/13
"comment by Wieghorst67 (U12621)
posted 8 seconds ago
In the eyes of many fans its not the same team thats the main thing"
=============================
Actually doesnt matter a jot. Only the truth matters. The truth is that we have kept our history.
The truth is what matters and every single authority recognises Rangers have kept their history.
Plenty of folk believe the earth is only a few thousand years old, no matter what the experts all tell them.
Anyone that thinks Rangers are a New Club are as stupid as the flat earth believers.
posted on 1/2/13
Things just wont be the same in my eyes and plenty other fans i know, its the liquidation thing, just giving you my opinion
posted on 1/2/13
Weighorst, your opinions dont mean anything though, the rest of us deal in facts.
posted on 1/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/2/13
your in the fourth teir and dont affect celtic anymore thats the FACTS and because you cannot compete or challenge Celtic this means your status as rivals has been removed in my mind
posted on 1/2/13
Rangers are the same club. FACT
No they are not fact
Even the SPL statement yesterday confirmed Rangers are the same club
6 players were registered to an spl club, when that club was dissolved they became free agents. If green owned the right to RFC the club then the SFA could not allow the players registered with them to leave without punishment.
Every rangers player has been re-registered with the SFA under a different Club, much the same way as the ones that left have registered with another club.
posted on 1/2/13
So why comment?
No need to answer we all know its because you are raging that we are still more successful than you.
posted on 1/2/13
You can have your own opinion but you can't have your own facts.
posted on 1/2/13
Im not raging one bit i have nothing to be raging about - im commenting on an article on the Celtic board with my opinions, thats what a forum is about??
posted on 1/2/13
Same mind numbing, boring pash, words in a different order.
posted on 1/2/13
Lee McCulloch has a legal length of service greater than a year which would be impossible if his old business did not exist. He transferred with yhe ecconomic entity which is the club.
What part of that fact do you dispute?
posted on 1/2/13
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 1/2/13
Anyway back to the question in hand
The only thing this new club has to offer any less of, to the SPL is HISTORY!
posted on 1/2/13
Rangers have the same SFA membership the club has always had, for around 140 years. Only the company running the club is new.
The more some Celtic fans keep going on about us, the more they prove we're the same club as before.
posted on 1/2/13
Littlebit,
Why cant you answer my question?
posted on 1/2/13
The only thing this new club has to offer any less of, to the SPL is HISTORY!
-----
No, they are quite happy to hoover up the TV revenue we generate. The thieving cants.
posted on 1/2/13
It's the Irn Bru badge on the side of the strips
posted on 1/2/13
Rangers have the same SFA membership the club has always had, for around 140 years. Only the company running the club is new.
Why did they need to reapply for SFA membership, sorry but that Govan Blue was not hibernating it was as dead as a Norwegian Blue in a monty pyton pet shop.
posted on 1/2/13
posted on 1/2/13
"Why did they need to reapply for SFA membership, sorry but that Govan Blue was not hibernating it was as dead as a Norwegian Blue in a monty pyton pet shop."
==============================
Because you have to apply to have it switched between legal entities.
Celtic had theirs moved in 1994, does that mean Celtic are a new club?
Now answer my question.
How does McCulloch legally have a LOS greater than the age of the company. This can only happen when there is a continuation of the economic entity (the club). So how has he managed it without the club continuing as it would be a legal first!
Page 1 of 3