Come on mate, just delete the other words and straight back to good old cinci

Not your number though U11551.

I agree Floyd, it was only a shallow snipe at everyone changings names every two minutes.
I say what i like, and i like what i bloody well say

4-2-3-1 for me. It might be a bit radical but I would try:

Ikeme
Henry Batth Johnson Foley
Doumbia Davies
Peszko O'Hara Sako
Siggy or Cassidy

actually i would kind of go with something similar to that gem.

Dww

I'd take that line up apart from the full backs

And I'll continue to 'try' and be positive despite how hard that is at present

Floyde my thinking on the back row is
1. Foley is a better full back than Ward
2. No-one else to play at RB except Doherty - too much pressure for the lad just now so might as well try Henry.
3. With Foley and Davies behind him less pressure on Sako to defend
4. With 2 holding mids O'Hara can get forward more where he works best.

I'd go foley and ward or Doherty and ward, he won't let us down and he'll benefit from the experience

You could well be right but I wish we had an alternative to Ward, he has been terrible this season.

And another ref gets suckered by Suarez. Foster saves - justice. That cheating little woman's part dives more often than Tom Daley.

Henry had a run at right back in Micks first season and was better there than in midfield! We must do something to get Ward out of the team.

I see Suarez is cheating again, I hate to see it even against Albion.

Given how pitiful our full backs are, maybe just play 3 at the back??

...........berra.......johnson.......batth
peszko.............davis.................ward
............ohara.............doumbia
...................sako...............
..........................siggy

No idea what peszko is like at covering, but its clear ward is ok going forward, dreadful as the last line of defence.

cinci I think Peszko is a bit like Hunt, lets his enthusiasm get the better of him sometimes.

Baggies 2 up!

I'd prefer us with a goalkeeper though cinci.

Presume he thinks that formation is that good, we won't need one

I dont think anyone needed to see the keeper to understand the formation.
All about effficiency on my part