Crikey you talk a lot of sense.

So U boat, you are now Crikey. Methinks you are a certain poster from 38 feet.

Anyway, I take issue with your emarks about how long we should give managers. No doubt that remark was made to me and others who were prepared toi give Stale time. He, like MM and TC have gone and I for one have not suggested for one minute that I'm prepared to give DS 3 years.

I don't think he's the right person and talks too much. He is at best a decent League 1 manager and that's where we're heading with him at the helm.

He would do in your eyes tats. He's your mate from 38 feet.

36' in 12 yards Sunny

Looks like Wolfie has almost gone the extra yard

wolfieinasunshinestate - are you not capable of commenting on the articles rather than the posters?

So I am clear now that Solbakken should have been given 3 years and Saunders should be given 7 matches. I think thats a very fair and rational attitude

I agree wholeheartedly with the op.

Is there a reason that you keep referring to your old site as 36' yards wolfie?

I'm surprised that you seem to dislike Saunders for talking too much when you also seem to have suggested you thought Stale, the ultimate talker/non-performer, was a good manager.

Crikey. all bar the first paragraph, I have commented on the article.

Here we go again with the dislike carp. I don't dislike DS at all. I just don't think he was the right appointment. I've also said he's probably a decent league 1 manager bur has had very litle experience at Championship level and what he did have he got his team relegated.

He couldn't save Doncaster and they were already in the R zone and now we are battling for survival after DS took over when we were mid table.

I'm afraid DS is becoming a worse "talker" than Stale,

18th is not midtable

Superb article Crikey, crikey have

It is when there are 35 in the table.

Considering some of the dodgy maths and tortuous, flawed logic we’ve been subjected to today that will probably be Sunny’s next claim.

Excellent article, and I hope it finally gets some of our "across-the-pond-dwellers" to see reason.

Regarding Saunders "talking too much", I've noticed that ALL managers are interviewed at the end of matches. In fact, they are contracted to, by the FA, Football League etc. Those that don't get penalised. No doubt the aptly acronymed "WITLESS" thinks Dean Sauders sits down and writes a thesis after each game.

Here we go again, WITTS bashing. Can we just leave it alone, on 36 yards preferably. Thats where cox is still posting

Trace I’m 100% sure that will happen the minute Sunny stops posting accusatory, inflammatory threads like this one

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/190690

until that happens he only has himself to blame.

Just block the fella if he winds you up that much

We all have that option Trace. You can block me if you don’t like what I write and so can Sunny. I’d rather deal with the rot he writes by showing that he’s wrong.

Fair enough, if youre gonna put a dog down, make it quick and painless will ya?

Ta

Hector
Big Time Investor

As I write, all, but one, voter has given this thread top marks. Wolfie's thread has every voter awarding it bottom marks.

That's a good reflection of how people are thinking, and how WITSS earns the scorn he attracts.

What was 36 yards? I remember with fond memories and a tear in my eye; a forum called 12 yards but I was never invited (clearly) onto 36 yards.

Sorry; what was the question again?

LOL, quite ridiculous, but very funny at the same time.

As it is now universally recognised that its the players that have dragged the club down, the players that were allowed to stagnate for a ridiculously long period, surely the finger should point to the manager that allowed that to happen?
Step forward......MICK MCCARTHY.

"universally" really? Thanks for speaking for every Wolves fan world wide

4 managers cant be wrong tats.....surely?