"theresonlyonereds it wouldn't take long to get his details."
That says more about the way your mind works, than it does us.
Personally, I would have Googled him. To see if you are telling the truth. I couldn't be rsed contacting him.
The fact you think that speaks volumes.
Either that or you're using it as an excuse because you lied.
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 minute ago
statman its interesting that you tell me to grow up yet don't seem bothered by some of the childish ganging up that has gone on throughout this thread.
I guess that speaks volumes about the true reason for your post.
-----------------
Trust me, no-one else has been close to being as childish as you. Some daft banter? Yes. But the owning and seething thing is a different level. Don't forget I was on your side to start with! But your behaviour leads me to believe you can't possibly be any older than about 16 at most.
yes you say that theresonlyonereds but you're a proven liar and you come across a sad weirdo so I don't trust you.
red man if you read back at some of the comments from some of the weirdos on this thread, it doesn't look so weird.
you don't agree, fine.
but please tell me, how does naming a lino prove anything?
statman and that's partly why I don't really care about your opinion. you are wrong, so you have shown you aren't very good at reading me.
owned is a common term. its just a massive bonus that it makes red man cry.
Raj
"oh dear. you really aren't very good at this."
That's the full house in Raj bingo!
More cliches. Oh dear Raj.
red man has given up replying on topic now.
always a good sign when his race is run.
owned!
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 2 seconds ago
yes you say that theresonlyonereds but you're a proven liar and you come across a sad weirdo so I don't trust you.
---------------------------------
Please don't use the things I've said to you and then repeat them back to me.
You haven't proved anything Raj, that's the thing with you, you just run your mouth without thinking, then get backed into a corner, with no way out, resulting on you making up some bizarre reasons as to why you can't prove it, or changing the subject or the best one, trying to deflect by telling people you've owned them.
I haven't proven it yet to everyone else. but you and I know you lied.
no change of subject.
you said that you reported me in a drunken state. then you denied it and called me a liar for saying it.
then you found the post and went quiet.
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 minute ago
statman and that's partly why I don't really care about your opinion. you are wrong, so you have shown you aren't very good at reading me
------------
You aren't going to say any different are you?
that's true statman. and im comfortable with you thinking what you want.
I was just being honest about why I don't really care about your other opinions. because you've got that one so wrong.
Raj
"but please tell me, how does naming a lino prove anything?"
Because if your not lying the refs name can be looked up on Google. The match can be looked up. You said it wasn't a high profile game, or high profile ref. the likelihood of you making it up is eliminated by you naming the ref and match.
You not naming one or both arouses suspicion and makes us think your lying. Especially when you hide behind the theory we'll all contact him.
red man. so tell me what would stop me from finding a match and naming a lino from it?
im not hiding from anything. I have told you im not naming him and why.
if you don't believe me fine. but that doesn't make me a liar.
Raj
"red man has given up replying on topic now"
Like I said. When you start resorting to 'owned you', 'seething' & 'you're not very good at this' we know there's not much more to say.
I've been proven right by you resorting to your cliched tactics.
im not resorting to anything red man. just adding to my on topic posts with my view of how the conversation is going.
I think I can tell when you are angry and when ive owned you.
and tonight is one of those nights.
no need to cry about it
Raj
"red man. so tell me what would stop me from finding a match and naming a lino from it?"
That's why we asked for details at the time. It would've been difficult for you to Google an obscure WCQ match, and lino.
We're still giving you a chance. Why don't you take it?
"you said that you reported me in a drunken state. then you denied it and called me a liar for saying it."
Another lie. Why do you keep lying Raj?
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 5 minutes ago
that's true statman. and im comfortable with you thinking what you want.
I was just being honest about why I don't really care about your other opinions. because you've got that one so wrong.
-----------
If I have got it so wrong, you genuinely ought to be embarrassed about how you go on. An adult ought to know better.
red man I have told you why im not naming him.
as I said, if you think I am lying fine. but you don't have any proof for that and certainly cant go round claiming to have found me out, or whatever your choice of phrase is.
theresonlyonereds. thanks for repeating the lie. itll make it better when I decide to post the evidence.
Raj
"im not resorting to anything red man. just adding to my on topic posts with my view of how the conversation is going."
Ok then. You didn't resort to the cliches earlier. It was only when you were proven wrong you got the 'owned you' etc comments out.
Funny that.
That's me for the night.
Raj
oh dear red. that was a lazy comeback. you don't even know what you are saying.
-----
Lasy? not at all seems I've found you yet again by mention more than one of your faux pas and yet you only want to focus on the one, which ive already explained your blunder.
thanks statman. you opinions means so much to me.
oh no hang on.
it doesn't.
no red you haven't.
posting at 7.20am and saying I reckon you think about me when you wake up is not a contradiction.
let me know if you need help with this.
Sign in if you want to comment
Rio Ferdinand
Page 127 of 152
128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132
posted on 27/6/13
"theresonlyonereds it wouldn't take long to get his details."
That says more about the way your mind works, than it does us.
Personally, I would have Googled him. To see if you are telling the truth. I couldn't be rsed contacting him.
The fact you think that speaks volumes.
Either that or you're using it as an excuse because you lied.
posted on 27/6/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 minute ago
statman its interesting that you tell me to grow up yet don't seem bothered by some of the childish ganging up that has gone on throughout this thread.
I guess that speaks volumes about the true reason for your post.
-----------------
Trust me, no-one else has been close to being as childish as you. Some daft banter? Yes. But the owning and seething thing is a different level. Don't forget I was on your side to start with! But your behaviour leads me to believe you can't possibly be any older than about 16 at most.
posted on 27/6/13
yes you say that theresonlyonereds but you're a proven liar and you come across a sad weirdo so I don't trust you.
posted on 27/6/13
would*
posted on 27/6/13
red man if you read back at some of the comments from some of the weirdos on this thread, it doesn't look so weird.
you don't agree, fine.
but please tell me, how does naming a lino prove anything?
posted on 27/6/13
statman and that's partly why I don't really care about your opinion. you are wrong, so you have shown you aren't very good at reading me.
owned is a common term. its just a massive bonus that it makes red man cry.
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
"oh dear. you really aren't very good at this."
That's the full house in Raj bingo!
More cliches. Oh dear Raj.
posted on 27/6/13
red man has given up replying on topic now.
always a good sign when his race is run.
owned!
posted on 27/6/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 2 seconds ago
yes you say that theresonlyonereds but you're a proven liar and you come across a sad weirdo so I don't trust you.
---------------------------------
Please don't use the things I've said to you and then repeat them back to me.
You haven't proved anything Raj, that's the thing with you, you just run your mouth without thinking, then get backed into a corner, with no way out, resulting on you making up some bizarre reasons as to why you can't prove it, or changing the subject or the best one, trying to deflect by telling people you've owned them.
posted on 27/6/13
I haven't proven it yet to everyone else. but you and I know you lied.
no change of subject.
you said that you reported me in a drunken state. then you denied it and called me a liar for saying it.
then you found the post and went quiet.
posted on 27/6/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 minute ago
statman and that's partly why I don't really care about your opinion. you are wrong, so you have shown you aren't very good at reading me
------------
You aren't going to say any different are you?
posted on 27/6/13
that's true statman. and im comfortable with you thinking what you want.
I was just being honest about why I don't really care about your other opinions. because you've got that one so wrong.
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
"but please tell me, how does naming a lino prove anything?"
Because if your not lying the refs name can be looked up on Google. The match can be looked up. You said it wasn't a high profile game, or high profile ref. the likelihood of you making it up is eliminated by you naming the ref and match.
You not naming one or both arouses suspicion and makes us think your lying. Especially when you hide behind the theory we'll all contact him.
posted on 27/6/13
red man. so tell me what would stop me from finding a match and naming a lino from it?
im not hiding from anything. I have told you im not naming him and why.
if you don't believe me fine. but that doesn't make me a liar.
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
"red man has given up replying on topic now"
Like I said. When you start resorting to 'owned you', 'seething' & 'you're not very good at this' we know there's not much more to say.
I've been proven right by you resorting to your cliched tactics.
posted on 27/6/13
im not resorting to anything red man. just adding to my on topic posts with my view of how the conversation is going.
I think I can tell when you are angry and when ive owned you.
and tonight is one of those nights.
no need to cry about it
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
"red man. so tell me what would stop me from finding a match and naming a lino from it?"
That's why we asked for details at the time. It would've been difficult for you to Google an obscure WCQ match, and lino.
We're still giving you a chance. Why don't you take it?
posted on 27/6/13
"you said that you reported me in a drunken state. then you denied it and called me a liar for saying it."
Another lie. Why do you keep lying Raj?
posted on 27/6/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 5 minutes ago
that's true statman. and im comfortable with you thinking what you want.
I was just being honest about why I don't really care about your other opinions. because you've got that one so wrong.
-----------
If I have got it so wrong, you genuinely ought to be embarrassed about how you go on. An adult ought to know better.
posted on 27/6/13
red man I have told you why im not naming him.
as I said, if you think I am lying fine. but you don't have any proof for that and certainly cant go round claiming to have found me out, or whatever your choice of phrase is.
posted on 27/6/13
theresonlyonereds. thanks for repeating the lie. itll make it better when I decide to post the evidence.
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
"im not resorting to anything red man. just adding to my on topic posts with my view of how the conversation is going."
Ok then. You didn't resort to the cliches earlier. It was only when you were proven wrong you got the 'owned you' etc comments out.
Funny that.
That's me for the night.
posted on 27/6/13
Raj
oh dear red. that was a lazy comeback. you don't even know what you are saying.
-----
Lasy? not at all seems I've found you yet again by mention more than one of your faux pas and yet you only want to focus on the one, which ive already explained your blunder.
posted on 27/6/13
thanks statman. you opinions means so much to me.
oh no hang on.
it doesn't.
posted on 27/6/13
no red you haven't.
posting at 7.20am and saying I reckon you think about me when you wake up is not a contradiction.
let me know if you need help with this.
Page 127 of 152
128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132