comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 3 minutes ago
you address me so i reply statman.

i don't comment about you, where as you comment about me.

if you believe im so childish, don't address me. surely thatd be sensible?
---------------

Why would that be sensible?

well you seem to be a little annoyed by me.so it'd be sensible to ignore me if that's the case.

if that's not the case then great.

good for you.

everyone happy.

happy happy happy.

like a puppet on a strrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggggggggg

hahaha!

Raj
red - not at all. i mocked him for thinking about me all the way to work because he posted just before he left and immediately when he arrived.
-----
All assumptions i take it?

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 49 seconds ago
well you seem to be a little annoyed by me.so it'd be sensible to ignore me if that's the case.

if that's not the case then great.

good for you.

everyone happy.

happy happy happy.
-------------

What makes you think I'm annoyed?

Statto

so Raj says "I think you read things into forum comments too much statman"

Then again he tells you "well you seem to be a little annoyed"
---
Now is tha a contradiction or what?

Iof course it is. All he does is contradict himself. Everyone can see it but Raj.

Another Rajtradiction.

Oh look Raj, I'm commenting, in the morning at 6:20 from the train. How sad am I?

.... and this thread/Raj bashing is still going on?

TOOR

Did you get up at 03:20 in readyness for your train?

http://www.bitrebels.com/entertainment-2/for-these-kids-the-neverending-story-never-ended/

http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/5/5b/Duracell_bunny.gif

dear me, the simpletons have been out!

we've got statman and red who don't seem to understand what contradiction means.

then red again seems to think that posting while on a train at 7.20 means that the train left at 7.20?

and good old theresonlyonereds going on about it being sad posting at a certain time of the morning. when have I ever said that?

you lot are so desperate to win an argument that you don't even think before you post!

statman I said I thought you were annoyed because of the style of criticism, as well as you insulting me, which is out of character.

that doesn't contradict the time when I said I thought you were reading too much into something that id posted.

im surprised you think it does. clearly you need to review your definition of the word contradiction!

you may argue its hypocritical. youd be wrong, but I can see why you might think it at least.

Raj

"im surprised you think it does. clearly you need to review your definition of the word contradiction!"

Go on then, enlighten us.

This should be interesting.

why should it be interesting?

i'll tell you what is interesting. I posted quotes from theresonlyonereds, you call me a liar, but refuse to prove it.

but anyway.

a contradiction is two statements that oppose one another.

the comments here clearly don't do that. they're about two totally different things.

of course you'll probably argue they aren't for several pages, realise you are wrong and then change the subject.

because that's what red man does.

Raj

You still haven't posted the TOOR quotes with the time of posting on. You could have made the quotes you provided up. I wouldn't put it past you.

"a contradiction is two statements that oppose one another."

Correct, I knew you'd get something right eventually if you kept plugging away. Well done.

No answer this. Were Red & STATMAN saying that the two statements were contradictory, or that you contradicted yourself?

You said STATMAN was reading too much into comments on here. Then proceeded to tell people they were seething. This is a contradiction.

coming from the lad that argues, argues, argues, realises he's wrong then resorts to 'owned you' & 'seething' comments.

How long will it take before you resort to the childish stuff tonight Raj?

Better hurry, I'm off to the pub in a bit.

red man. at least ive posted the quotes. you claim he said something and haven't posted anything at all.

its actually difficult to explain just how wrong you are on this.

the two matters are completely different.

firstly, what you are describing is hypocrisy, not contradiction.

do you know the difference?

secondly, your suggestion of hypocrisy (without realising it) is wrong.

statman made a specific comment about something id said and I said that I thought he had read too much into my initial comment.

that is totally different to judging someones mood based on them insulting you.

the other problem with your point is that I would agree that I probably have read too much into what someone has said before.

we all do it.

its perfectly reasonable to say that I felt he'd read too much into something. I wasn't rude. I didn't criticise him for it. I didn't suggest its something I don't do.

oh dear red man.

it looks like you picked another argument that you cant win.

but youre right. I must refrain from that childish stuff. I should post more like you and call people a schoolkid because they don't post during the day.

classic!

Raj

No you posted something you could've dreamt up during maths that afternoon. Until you provide actual quotes, with the times, I'll take it as you lying again.

You really will argue black is white. You contradicted yourself. You claimed STATMAN was doing something you do regularly. You read too much into the tone of people's posts, by claiming they are 'seething'. If you can't see that then more fool you. I suggest you get your dictionary out and check the meaning of 'contradicting yourself'. Hypocrisy is similar, but not the case here.

"but youre right. I must refrain from that childish stuff. I should post more like you and call people a schoolkid because they don't post during the day."

Nope, I've called you a school kid based on your behaviour and the times you regularly post on here, out of school hours & not, with the exception of last night, after 9. Perhaps if you modified your behaviour I wouldn't think you are a child.

Anyway, there's a pint with my name on it. Haven't you got a life to be getting on with? It is Friday night.

red man and until you post any quotes I will take it as you lying.

whats the difference?

why are you so scared of looking for it? or have you looked and realised im right but too childish to admit it?

brilliant.

red man doesn't understand the difference between contradiction and hypocrisy!

a contradiction would be:

- you cant possibly judge my mood from what I post
- you are angry - I can tell from your posts

my two posts do not contradict one another. the way you are describing them they work together i.e. they mean the same thing.

therefore you are accusing me of hypocrisy, not contradiction.

you never admit when you are wrong so im sure this will rumble on, but keep reading what I say and maybe you'll be educated by the end of it.

oh and no - you said not posting during the day probably means someone is at school.

oh dear red man. have you forgotten what you wrote?

shall we go back through some of your other mature posts?

oh bless you red man.

if we were keeping score id probably be beating you about 45-0 by now.

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
statman I said I thought you were annoyed because of the style of criticism, as well as you insulting me, which is out of character.

that doesn't contradict the time when I said I thought you were reading too much into something that id posted.

im surprised you think it does. clearly you need to review your definition of the word contradiction!

you may argue its hypocritical. youd be wrong, but I can see why you might think it at least.
--------------------

Oh good. I'll sleep tonight.

Raj, if we were keeping score, the only thing you could beat is your meat, ya wa.....

Raj smells like a v ag. Owned. You've taken a terrible beating. I winned you.

You've bettered him TOOR.

Winnage to the maximum.