Raj

I can sum up the points you 'specifically made'

1) I know a refs assessor/lino/WC player/have taken my refs exam.

2) You're wrong, I know better than you

3) You're getting angry/upset

4) I've owned you

Repeat ad nauseum

There you go, your 'specific points' in a nut shell. They're so sophisticated they can be generalised to every debate you take part in.

Your not going to take the friendly hint, and perhaps have a look at how you interact with others, to see why you get given short shrift on here?

You didn't spend a lot of time this weekend on here? Like from first thing Saturday, and most of Sunday? You didn't pop back on for 5 mins last night 'whilst your wife was doing something' but stay for about an hour?

"i didnt call you weirdos because you use this forum."

The implication was more than there. Are these your famous social skills in evidence?

Classic Raj 'forum tactic' the more I tell them they're wrong the more I believe it.

i am merely using a description term to help give my opinion.

But I didn’t because I thought you might have it in you to understood what I meant.
-----------------------------

Help in what way? How would I know what you mean when you make things up? Ironically that is becoming standard.

Oh and it's" descriptive" term.

You're either stupid or a brilliant WUM.

Loz

Just because me and my sleepy grapefruit 'owned you'. You're angry now.

Loz

You are All virgins and I know non of you
---
I know a Virgin

actually red man i specifically explained why you had misinterpreted the rules incorrectly.

i also asked you a question that you were not able to answer, which was very helpful in proving my point.

then you guys decided to take comfort in behaving like a group of children.

robin its not a new word is it? defence. tactic. you know what they mean?

i was describing the behaviour of the group of people on this thread.

it really is rather basic and i suspect you are arguing it because you got the point about absurd wrong.

So the bottom line is Raj can't access the Internet during work hours, but drops in most nights and at the weekends. And he would be on here during the day like a lot of other posters if he could access it at work.

Raj

"then you guys decided to take comfort in behaving like a group of children."

Nope, your patronising manner, arrogance, obstinance & the childish way you interact on here got the response it deserved.

statman the bottom line is i spend the odd hour here or there on here, and there are several days that go by without me using it.

people like theresonlyonereds are on here for most of their waking day it would seem.

so in other words red man, yes you lot dragged it off topic but its all my fault.

its also my fault that i come back and theres four or five pages of childish behaviour from you lot.

great logic.

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 47 seconds ago
statman the bottom line is i spend the odd hour here or there on here, and there are several days that go by without me using it.

people like theresonlyonereds are on here for most of their waking day it would seem.
----------

Its better than working if you can get away with it. I've just been given more responsibility at work, so my days of debating all day are gone. I'll probably have a look at lunch time and maybe the odd time through the day, but mostly I won't have time. But whether I am able to post during work or not will not have any impact on the quality of my social life.

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 3 minutes ago
so in other words red man, yes you lot dragged it off topic but its all my fault.

its also my fault that i come back and theres four or five pages of childish behaviour from you lot.

great logic.
-----------

Raj, when just start being childish and claiming you've 'owned' someone, which is frankly cringeworthy, don't be surprised if you are treated with the disdain you deserve.

I still don't find it difficult to believe that you might know a referees assessor, lino etc, but you've made a real tw at of yourself on here. I think that everyone can agree on that.

Raj It's funny how you claim you came on here to debate when the very first thing you said to me was I was a hypocrite! How's that debating the original point?

So because you're lying I have no life? I think you're confused there little buddy.

Hi Raj

Do you know a bloke called Steve?

Raj

What Statman said, he beat me to it.

statman work is something different. although i do think if you spend lots of time on here at work then you are probably not going far in your career.

regarding owning people. it was actually a liverpool fan that started that on this thread.

funny how no one cried about it then?

anyway. i like the way it winds people up and have come to like the term. so i'll keep using it.

but if you want to try and pretend that is what derailed the debate then you are really stretching the boundaries of reality.

bottom line is that to each comment about the subject, i replied with a comment about the subject.

most other people cant claim that.

but im not lying theresonlyonereds. thats the point.

you cant bring yourself to comprehend its possible to know interesting people because you spend your life using a forum.

lest we forget your idea of a social life is going drinking with your mates.

what an interesting life you must have led.

lucky wife.

But you are lying Raj, your whole story isn't consistent with the way a normal person would tell it. We both know you're lying, there's only one person who feels a fool here. Really think about it, which one of us is lying? Who feels a fool? Have a good think Raj Collina.

Raj

"regarding owning people. it was actually a liverpool fan that started that on this thread."

Who was that then?

Raj, you were the one banging on about mates and having a social life. I'm a grown man, I don't spend time with mates, I have a wife and a home to build. In fact last week I had a few beers with a mate watching the Grand National and that was the first in months.

You keep banging on about people using a forum, as if you know them, having done it from the first moment you signed up with the new account you're now using. How would you know it?

Again, you're a returning banned user/sock account and again we both know it, we both know you're lying and again I'll ask, who feels a fool?

theresonlyonereds i am not lying. it doesnt matter how much you say it. you have no idea.

theres no inconsistencies with what i have said.

only an idiot would continue to claim that someone on a forum where no one knows anyone is definitely lying.

as i said. in your life it would be unbelievable. but some of us dont live online.

red man why dont you go back and look for yourself