or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 3777 comments are related to an article called:

Rio Ferdinand

Page 83 of 152

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 16/4/13

Its true. Raj said so.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

ahh bless - look at them all queuing up to try and win just one argument!

red man what has the reason for me joining the thread got to do with anything?

we were discussing who dragged the thread off topic.

clearly i wouldnt criticise off topic posts as its been off topic for weeks and i have been joining in.

oh. and i didnt lie about kneerash.

try again son

posted on 16/4/13

ffp

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

red

my comments about interpretation match exactly what i have said on this thread. if youd like it explained to you again let me know.

i did not use suarez to deflect the conversation from rio.

and yes. i said his post was off topic. because it was.

did have a point red?

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

statman seems that you have unwittingly joined the children.

i have not ignored anything that invalidates my argument. thats because nothing has invalidated my argument and i have always explained why.

you started this as a sensible poster but you seem to have become a bit pathetic like the others.

shame.

posted on 16/4/13

i see

posted on 16/4/13

Yeah you did raj, I'm not going to go into all the details again but simply you jumped into a debate you had part in with an insult aa your first comment, you then spent your own precious time trying to prove a point that's not there, got laughed at and then called out on several lies.

See you're basically just a completely unoriginal fella who just can't admit fault with yourself. You say I said owned first then you use it over and over again. You just tell people they're rattled and that they're wring over and over again.

Unoriginal and repetitive, and a shown up liar to boot.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

i proved that you are an obsessed hypocrite kneerash.

youve been crying ever since.

keeping denying though. its funny watching you squirm.

posted on 16/4/13

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

the idea i have been shown up is said by people that have repeatedly lost arguments against me.

oh. and attention seekers that follow me around like mancblueloz.

posted on 16/4/13

AND ME!

posted on 16/4/13

Raj

Go on then, show us how you proved Kneerash is an obsessed hypocrite?

Show us how you weren't lying?

posted on 16/4/13

But raj you didn't, you googled me and posted up two links that showed a few comments I'd made on the old 606, I've posted thousands of comments on this site and the old 606. I've never put an article up on the united board, I'm not filtered or board banned on the united board. Ask any of the united fans on here if I'm some obsessed fella constantly posting on their board? If I was the obsessed person you think I am I'd be banned, filtered etc? But I'm not.

It's up to you to actually put a case forward to prover your theory, you'd need to be able to show me posting articles on the united board, a high % of comments made in a negative light about united on united articles.

You won't do this as you can't do this, I've proven over and over again that you're wrong with your assumption, I've shown you up to have lied over and over again on this thread and all you have done is said I'm rattled and crying countless times.

You've been shown up on here by just about everyone, but sure come back with your well thought out, original reply like you always do.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

its all there red man. he called people obsessed for talking about suarez. i showed he regularly talks about united.

red man. let me point out one thing. this is about your 6th or 7th attempt at finding something to argue.

it will go the same way as the others. you will lose and then change the subject.

posted on 16/4/13

red

my comments about interpretation match exactly what i have said on this thread. if youd like it explained to you again let me know.

i did not use suarez to deflect the conversation from rio.

and yes. i said his post was off topic. because it was.

did have a point red?
-----
There you go again, you've dismissed everyone that has said he could of got a Red card by saying its never a Red card because you know people and you kmow better, so tell me what consideration have you given peoples opinions and interpretations.

So why did you bring Suarez up then?

Boris's comment if digging holes was hardly off topic if he thought you were digging one with your comments, it your forum defence tactic.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

kneerash you didnt mention being banned or anything. you just had a pop at people for talking about suarz a lot.

well i showed that on every page of comments several were about united.

so by your logic that makes you obsessed.



quotes like this:

I've shown you up to have lied over and over again on this thread

show you are squirming.

i havent lied once. so making up that i have is a desperate ploy to regain some credibility after i made you think of me all the way to work.

that was a funny night. you were absolutely seething.

posted on 16/4/13

Kneerash

I'm afraid well thought out, succinct and accurate posts are classed as "rants" here.

Often "nice rants" though.

Also discussing Manchester Utd, one of the biggest football clubs in the world, on a football forum, "regularly", is also owned.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

red actually we covered interpretation and where it is relevant and where it isnt.

i didnt bring suarez up unless it was being discussed.

how was boris's comments on topic? we were discussing agueros challenge and his response included nothing but stuff about digging holes.

seriously. are you that stupid to argue that his post was on topic?

now that is funny.

posted on 16/4/13

Raj

Have a read of Kneerash's latest post. How about, instead of saying he's crying, you address some valid points he makes.

Face it, you lied. Anything you say can't be trusted. Once a liar, always a liar.

Have you ever wondered why pretty much everyone, who interacts with you, on here reacts to you in the same way?

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

i see robin is still lurking around.

of all the people i have owned on here, he is up there with the most enjoyable ones.

classic seething mode.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

red man whilst you were busy writing that post i addressed his points.

oh dear red man. oh dear.

posted on 16/4/13

Is "classic seething mode" from the "standard tactics"?

posted on 16/4/13

Raj

How is that 'oh dear'?

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

no its a description of when someone is clearly wound up.

you dont hide it very well robin. sorry to be the one to tell you that.

but at least now you can work on improving.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 16/4/13

because whilst you were whining at me to respond, i had responded.

you can shout liar liar as much as you like.

i havent lied once and you've just lost your 10th argument with me.

10-0.

Page 83 of 152

Sign in if you want to comment