statman a trip against an opponent off the ball will never be treated as violent conduct.

a trip on a referee is treated differently and that was never part of my original point.

what part of that dont you understand?

you never answered my question. dont you think its strange that no one has ever been sent off for violent conduct for tripping a player off the ball? why do you think that is?

Raj

When did I say you could of been at work? I said that I didn't mention where you are in my original comment, I didn't mention you being at home, at work etc.

I reckon it was the first thing you did after you woke up. But this is just my opinion. I think you opened your eyes, ran down stairs, and started bashing away at the keyboard. Look I'm only basing this on your actions.

Again, when did I say anything about where you are?

You're the one getting this monumentally wrong. Face it, you got caught out. You know what, it's funny watching you get wound up by this. Especially considering one of your tactics is to judge people based on the time of day they post on here. If you can't take it, I suggest you don't dish it out.

Red man

Below is a couple of comments from when Raj was on about when people used this forum

and as you'll see he wrote

"i am using peoples use of the forum to form an opinion."

"if you dont like it, tough."

Now that you've formed an opinion with his early morning comment the teddy comes out of the cot with the how do you know where I am at 06.50, what hypocrite he is.
--------
comment by RED666👺 (U6562)

Raj

Its ok you saying
but there's a difference between using the forum on occasion and using it day in day out like you do.

But do you know peoples circumstances? Erm, NO!!
---------------------------
comment by Raj (U17528)

red i am not saying its not ok.

i am using peoples use of the forum to form an opinion.

if you dont like it, tough.

Red

He's having a go at me for assuming he posted on here as soon as he got up. Whilst assuming I work in an office and have the same daily routine, which is indicative of my 'inadequate life'.

That Raj is a conundrum wrapped in an enigma with a big ball of contradiction thrown in.

So just to recap;

Black is white.
Up is down.
Left is right.

Rajdiculous.

oh red man. in your constant twisting you forget things. which makes this all the more amusing.

'did i speculate that you were at home, at work, anywhere else?'

you understand what imply means dont you? if i couldnt have been at work, then yes, you are speculating about where i was. if i could have been at work, then you are suggesting i slept at work. Which is it?

oh dear red man. oh dear oh dear. caught. out.

lets make this nice and simple. when you said to me that this was my first waking thought you automatically assumed that because it was early in the morning i must have posted it having just woken up i.e. wherever i slept.

it didn't cross your mind that i might have been up for a while and nowhere near the bed i slept in.

why? because you got all excited that you might have something to mock me with. and yet again you come out of it looking like a bit of an idiot. when will you learn?

oh and about you working in an office. i never said you did.

i mocked the idea that the only possible scenario at 6.50 is that i have just woken up.

unlucky.

ah look at red giving it a go. what did i tell you guys about thinking before you post?

there was no confusion over my comments. red man admitted that he posted from home in the evenings, sometimes late at night. my opinion was based on that, and no one disputed where people were posting from.

the comments about posting in the morning are factually incorrect. red man assumed i must have just got up and therefore would be near the bed i slept in.

my opinion about what the facts say about his life are different to actual facts about where i was.

do you see the difference or do you need it broken down into a more simpleton friendly explanation?

Rajmongous.

Raj

You are really not all there in the brains dept'.

I was mocking you for posting at the crack of dawn. If you chose to interpret that as me implying I knew where you were, then that's your own look out. In your own words 'if you don't like it tough'.

IMO you woke up, jumped straight on the nearest device with Internet access, and started to bash away at that keyboard of yours. I'm only basing this opinion on your actions. Again in your own words 'if you don't like it tough'.

"oh and about you working in an office. i never said you did."

You said 'I work at a desk all day, and keep the sane regular hours'. You then went on to say that this was proof of my 'inadequete life'. Now I know you're not the sharpest pencil in the pencil case. But tell us where people that sit at desks and work the same hours work?

Your reaction to this is hilarious, considering the stick you gave others about the time they post on here. Red666 has already highlighted your hypocrisy. If you can't take it, I suggest you refrain from dishing it out young man.

Raj has spoken. Begat all those who forbad him.

Rajehovah

here we go. back on the red man train. he'll argue the point until he realises he is wrong and picks something else to argue.

you claimed i posted as soon as i woke up. by definition that is implying where i am.

as it happens i was on a train.

its not hypocritical. we established you were posting home home late at night. i think this means you have a pretty crap life.

you haven't established where i was.

see the difference?

about you in an office. did i actually say those words? dont think i did.

i said we dont all work at a desk all day and work the same hours. mocking your post.

oh dear red man. you certainly need someone to come and back you up because you're making a right pigs ear of this.

by the way red man. do you see how you've just left the argument about boris posting off topic behind?

completely left it.

you have been doing that all thread. lose an argument and move onto the next one.

yet if i forget to respond to one point from your posts, you start crying.

found. out.

you claimed i posted as soon as i woke up. by definition that is implying where i am.
------------------------

No it's not. In fact implying something by definition would be an oxymoron.

In your case just a moron.

Raj

A double post, oh dear Raj, oh dear.

Lets play your game shall we.

Your claiming I'm implying where you were at 6.50 yesterday morning. Yet when it comes to your comment about working in an office you say 'about you in an office. did i actually say those words? dont think i did'. Did I actually say where you were? I don't think I did.

You're really not taking this well. All I'm doing is using your principle of opinion, to make a judgment about your life. I never said it was a fact, just an opinion based on your actions, i.e the time of day you posted on here. If you don't like it tough.

"we established you were posting home home late at night. i think this means you have a pretty crap life."

Oh dear Raj. Who's been on here most nights this week, as well as weekends? What happened to your amazing social life? What happened to your wife? You even posted at half time during last nights match, were you not out with imaginary mates watching it?

The more you make an issue of this, the funnier it gets. You started judging people based on their use of this site. Now your crying about getting it back.

You started judging people based on their use of this site. Now your crying about getting it back.
-------------------------

Truedat

no robin. by definition he is implying that i was near a bed having just woken up.

no oxymoron there. unlucky.

Raj

"no robin. by definition he is implying that i was near a bed having just woken up."

Show me where I said you were 'near a bed'?

I said you jumped out

Then why is definition not a synonym of imply. Implying by it's very nature is not giving a definition.

Moreover I woke up on a train today. I often snooze on transport and then use my phone.

thats the thing red man.

you actually said that i had posted after waking up. you were talking about me.

i wasnt even referring to you in my post was i?

if you had just mocked the time of day i was posting i would have told you that i was on a train and that would ruin your point.

i mocked you using the forum at night on a regular basis and you admitted doing it at home. that helped conclude my opinion.

alternatively kneerash said he posts at work at night so that concluded a different opinion.

are you getting it yet?

nice desperation on the crying part though. credit to you. as i said. best use that on a thread where you havent been seething for weeks and it might be more believable.

wanna carry on with this topic for longer or have you got a new one?

'Implying by it's very nature is not giving a definition.'

didnt say it was.

looks like you need reading lessons.

if the first thing i did was post after waking up then by definition i was near the place the place i slept. hence the implication.

dear dear robin. is this the 5th time you've picked something to argue on this thread?

still not getting anywhere.

red man do you understand what implication means?

how can i show you where you said something if all i said was you implied it?

doctor. can you get red man a dictionary. it might help with his moods.