or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 288 comments are related to an article called:

Rangers/Green/Whyte

Page 1 of 12

posted on 5/4/13

Why is a Celtic winger writing about Rangers?

posted on 5/4/13

Holy feckin sh it - how much garbage can one guy write in one blog.

Nowhere does it say that Whyte set up, was involved in or a part of S evco. Not a single piece of evidence to say this.

Nowhere is there any proof of fraud in any way by Green.

Seriously - others have been caught out posting claims as fact - this guy should be careful, as should those who repost defamatory comments.

posted on 5/4/13

Davie, I dont argue with anything you say but surely there must be a wee part of you saying to yourself, "Hang on, what if there is something amiss here?"

Hes admitting he lied to Whyte to get his way, who's to say hes not lied to others since?
(And yes, I admit Whytes a complete chancer!)

posted on 5/4/13

Said it before - show me ANY businessman who says HE has not lied in any business dealing, and THEN I'll show you a liar.

Green needed to butter Whyte up pre possible CVA to get the shares. Soon as CVA failed, Whyte got canned.

I see nothing amiss other than fans of other teams, nutcase bloggers and so called journos jumping on a bandwagon of a proven liar, because they think it sells.

Whyte has nothing.

posted on 5/4/13

Well, I hope for the sake of the Rangers support you're right. I have my doubts and Ill stand by my prediction elsewhere that Ally will indeed be walking away shortly.

posted on 5/4/13

It is just unreal that all this pash is being played out by two guys called Greene and Whyte. You honestly couldn't make it up Anyway, here is a funny picture

http://tinyurl.com/cuv3dty

posted on 5/4/13

Found another one of Mr Whyte

http://i50.tinypic.com/2yln4ns.jpg

posted on 5/4/13

AK

posted on 5/4/13

posted on 5/4/13

I think this is Mitre

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/it/3/3f/Gothmog.jpg

posted on 5/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/4/13

davie- have you read it?

posted on 5/4/13

Sorry Irvine, read it earlier. Occam's razor and all that. Seems straightforward enough, nothing offensive.

comment by atheist (U2783)

posted on 5/4/13

Reads like a good plot-line; as for truth, who knows?

posted on 5/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by BB⁷ (U13430)

posted on 5/4/13

This is concerning. Why would Charlie need to soften Craigy up??

I hope Bears ask questions and demand answers. You should know burying your heads in the sand won't work

posted on 5/4/13

"Reads like a good plot-line; as for truth, who knows?"

This blogger it seems.

posted on 5/4/13

"This is concerning. Why would Charlie need to soften Craigy up??"

Every prospective bidder had to soften Craig up though. It was required for share transfer. TBK's done it.

posted on 5/4/13

Every prospective bidder had to soften Craig up though. It was required for share transfer. TBK's done it
-----------------------------------------------------

Soften up a man with no discernible track record of success - aye right

As others have said serious questions should be asked - and soon

posted on 5/4/13

' Just keep building those walls high and nobody will get in.'

They're climbing down the inside of them walls you speak of. It's a farkin' carve up of Ibrox.

posted on 5/4/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/4/13

"Soften up a man with no discernible track record of success - aye right"

Aye right. Every bidder would have needed confirmation that they would have the shares transferred over to them in order to proceed with the CVA. Whyte wasn't just going to give them away.


"As others have said serious questions should be asked - and soon"

Of course.

posted on 5/4/13

We can speculate all we want, but none of us know what really has happened- regardless of the club we support. Celtic fans don't know what happened and are looking for something; equally Rangers fans don't know what's happened and remain sceptical.

posted on 5/4/13

"To entertain Whyte was foolish at best, and deeply concerning at worst."

Of course it was.

All I'm saying is that the other bidders in the process also entertained Whyte.

posted on 5/4/13

BN - so why does Whyte still think that he has claims to the capital assets

Page 1 of 12

Sign in if you want to comment