modric is a better deep lying play maker , gets moves going , his lower centre of gravity gives him better agilty when dribbling and he can be more of a threat. Modric although smaller is also better defensively.
Nasri on the other had is more of a threat further up the pitch as an advanced playmaker hes more dangerous , at times instead of playing a through ball he goes on a run and finishes superbly. hes also physically stronger on the ball .
Realistically speaking I cant see nasri at chelsea , modric would be a better addition to the squad
Nasri vs Modric
Page 1 of 1
posted on 3/8/11
Henderson
posted on 3/8/11
Downing.
posted on 3/8/11
Just feel lucky to be alive to witness the resurgence of midfield generals in players like Henderson & Downing.
Aside from magic beans there are precious few investments that look so strong on paper.
posted on 3/8/11
They're different players
posted on 3/8/11
modric is a better deep lying play maker , gets moves going , his lower centre of gravity gives him better agilty when dribbling and he can be more of a threat. Modric although smaller is also better defensively.
Nasri on the other had is more of a threat further up the pitch as an advanced playmaker hes more dangerous , at times instead of playing a through ball he goes on a run and finishes superbly. hes also physically stronger on the ball .
Realistically speaking I cant see nasri at chelsea , modric would be a better addition to the squad
Page 1 of 1