sagna sent off easy man utd win.
He didn't get the ball, and Walcott was offside.
Why should sagna of been sent off?
Well, he booked our players for similar changes to that of yours and Sagna should have been red carded. He gave you every little decision.
He's a fat, odious cretin.
You got a clear penalty that wasn't a penalty and we got a clear penalty turned down. Disgrace
Meant a penalty that clearly wasn't
sanga
If you think that wasn't a penalty then you are a moron.
Please do not talk about referee's decisions when it's worth remembering you would have 3 less points on the board if it was not for those absoloutely useless set of officials against Norwich. Those 3 points will just sneak it for you i bet.
You would of dropped points yesterday if it wasn't for the referee
If Arsenal get top 4 the referee's association should get an honourary top 4 trophy medal
Penalties this season ?? Arsenal and Chelsea must have over 6/7 each.. us 0.
How was it a penalty kagawa?
good article.
although walcott was miles offside and sagna should have been yellow carded 4 times
I can't think of a time where spurs should of had a penalty. All penaltys arsenal got were corrected except the one vs Fulham. Which we missed
Sagna should if been yellow carded once for that lunge on carrick I think on the first half
It was a penalty.
I would be livid if Rafael had pulled the same challange on Podolski and the ref had waved it away.
Please do not talk about referee's decisions when it's worth remembering you would have 3 less points on the board if it was not for those absoloutely useless set of officials against Norwich. Those 3 points will just sneak it for you i bet.
---
good memory
comment by sagna. alri (U17751)
--
you just look like a t!t because even arsenal fans are agreeing it was a penalty, give up on the wum mate.
No I wouldn't because that would of meant rafael got the ball
No I wouldn't because that would of meant rafael got the ball
---
show me proof that sagna got the ball
I'm not wumming. Is getting the ball considered a foul?
Did you not see the challenge? You can clearly see sagna got the ball. If you can't see that you are blind
So why is it only you who thinks that Sagna got the ball and it wasn't a foul/penalty?
I'm not wumming. Is getting the ball considered a foul?
--------------
Giroud got the ball but then received a red card.
"Getting the ball" doesn't automatically mean no foul was committed, particularly if you have to watch multiple super slow mo replays to decide if there was the faintest of contacts on the ball in the first place.
It's not only me. Anyway with a brain could see it wasn't a penalty. Girouds tackle was with studs up. Clear red
Sign in if you want to comment
Sagna
Page 2 of 3
posted on 28/4/13
sagna sent off easy man utd win.
posted on 28/4/13
He didn't get the ball, and Walcott was offside.
posted on 28/4/13
Why should sagna of been sent off?
posted on 28/4/13
Well, he booked our players for similar changes to that of yours and Sagna should have been red carded. He gave you every little decision.
He's a fat, odious cretin.
posted on 28/4/13
You got a clear penalty that wasn't a penalty and we got a clear penalty turned down. Disgrace
posted on 28/4/13
Meant a penalty that clearly wasn't
posted on 28/4/13
sanga
If you think that wasn't a penalty then you are a moron.
posted on 28/4/13
Please do not talk about referee's decisions when it's worth remembering you would have 3 less points on the board if it was not for those absoloutely useless set of officials against Norwich. Those 3 points will just sneak it for you i bet.
posted on 28/4/13
You would of dropped points yesterday if it wasn't for the referee
posted on 28/4/13
If Arsenal get top 4 the referee's association should get an honourary top 4 trophy medal
posted on 28/4/13
Penalties this season ?? Arsenal and Chelsea must have over 6/7 each.. us 0.
posted on 28/4/13
How was it a penalty kagawa?
posted on 28/4/13
good article.
although walcott was miles offside and sagna should have been yellow carded 4 times
posted on 28/4/13
I can't think of a time where spurs should of had a penalty. All penaltys arsenal got were corrected except the one vs Fulham. Which we missed
posted on 28/4/13
Sagna should if been yellow carded once for that lunge on carrick I think on the first half
posted on 28/4/13
It was a penalty.
I would be livid if Rafael had pulled the same challange on Podolski and the ref had waved it away.
posted on 28/4/13
Please do not talk about referee's decisions when it's worth remembering you would have 3 less points on the board if it was not for those absoloutely useless set of officials against Norwich. Those 3 points will just sneak it for you i bet.
---
good memory
posted on 28/4/13
comment by sagna. alri (U17751)
--
you just look like a t!t because even arsenal fans are agreeing it was a penalty, give up on the wum mate.
posted on 28/4/13
No I wouldn't because that would of meant rafael got the ball
posted on 28/4/13
No I wouldn't because that would of meant rafael got the ball
---
show me proof that sagna got the ball
posted on 28/4/13
I'm not wumming. Is getting the ball considered a foul?
posted on 28/4/13
Did you not see the challenge? You can clearly see sagna got the ball. If you can't see that you are blind
posted on 28/4/13
So why is it only you who thinks that Sagna got the ball and it wasn't a foul/penalty?
posted on 28/4/13
I'm not wumming. Is getting the ball considered a foul?
--------------
Giroud got the ball but then received a red card.
"Getting the ball" doesn't automatically mean no foul was committed, particularly if you have to watch multiple super slow mo replays to decide if there was the faintest of contacts on the ball in the first place.
posted on 28/4/13
It's not only me. Anyway with a brain could see it wasn't a penalty. Girouds tackle was with studs up. Clear red
Page 2 of 3