or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 19 comments are related to an article called:

If you could only change one element ?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 3/5/13

Moxey

posted on 3/5/13

I'd say 6 or 7 players, the constant in our decline

posted on 3/5/13

saunders

not because I think he has been to blame for all of this, but I don't think he is a particularly good manager and should he do well in div 3 next season, I have no faith he won't be poor in div 2 again.

wolves need to find a quality manager who can reorganise and replace our squad over a couple of seasons of growth. I do believe a good manager could challenge for the title next season even with our current squad. and by definition a good manager would still leave henry, ward, johnson and a few others out of the first team whilst giving doherty, bath, davis, mcalinden and a few others a chance.

changing 6/7 players is only any good if we have a manager who knows who to buy and sell.

posted on 3/5/13

Morgan. His decision making is laughable!

posted on 3/5/13

I'm afraid it's not just down to pointing at one option. DS has to go, so do quite a few of the squad. As much as I'd like to see Morgan go, I don't think that's going to happen, unless he keeps his promise of "If I'm not wanted, I'll go."

As gb states, we have to get a quality manager in asap, who can not only get us back to the Championship, but with a few tweaks here and there can get us back to the Premiership within a few years.

I'll put my mortgage on it and say DS 'ain't gonna do it for us.

posted on 3/5/13

Players for me, as you said, they are the one constant on the playing side, 4 managers failed to get them playing.

That said, Saunders isn't far behind, nor are Morgan and Moxey.

posted on 3/5/13

Metal

posted on 3/5/13

Saunders. He is the devil incarnate.

posted on 3/5/13

Most of the posters on here who still believe that the players are not largely responsible.

posted on 3/5/13

Agree floyd ship out muppets dross.

Viva la clear out.

posted on 3/5/13

We just need a good manager. The last three have been hopeless. A decent manager would have had us far higher up the table with exactly the same players. And if a decent manager was given over £10m to spend as Solbakken was then we would surely have been promoted back to the top flight

comment by aries22 (U1203)

posted on 3/5/13

I agree with Crikey. The manager is the most important appointment at a club. Get a good one, and he will sort out the squad and the playing style.
I also agree with Herbert - Moxey just has to go. He is a fool, and he proves it every time he talks to the media. He talks utter nonsense.

posted on 4/5/13

Find out who is advising Morgan on his managerial appointments and have them shot at dawn.
Oh and Saunders.

posted on 4/5/13

I really think Morgan & Moxey only think in terms of 'how much is a new manager going to cost' without realising managers actually have different abilities & the best manager although probably the most expensive manager ,would probably make then the most money.

They certainly didn't appreciate Mick was getting exceptional performances from very average players. Yes Mick bought them...but with their severe restrictions.

In order of priority IMO you have to have the very best you can afford for the following or else you are screwed...

1) Manager
2) Keeper
3) Captain
4) Goalscorer

The rest are essentially just supporting roles

posted on 4/5/13

We are changing one element in the championship!
'Au'.
We're getting rid of it.

posted on 4/5/13

At the beginning of February Bolton with new manager Freedman were 20th - they should finish in the play offs.

Wolves were in a similar position with new manager Saunders - they will finish relegated,

Doesn't take an Einstein to draw the obvious conclusion - but for Morgan I'll spell it out.

Morgan - you,ve made a complete c.ck up again, the third one in a row.

Do us a favour and p.ss off

posted on 4/5/13

Simon - I can understand why you say that about Morgan giving the impression he wants to get low cost managers in. But what does not stack up to me is two things

1. His Redrow business would not have made him a multi millionaire if his priority in employing managers was low cost. To be successful like that he must realise the value of quality management.

2, If he invested in Wolves to make some money then the only way he will do that is by making us an established Premier League club then selling it on. That's the only way he can make a mint. So in that respect he wants the same as the supporters.

He has screwed up three times now appointing managers as Wolves chairman. I don't accept that's because he is not a football man because I suspect he has watched more football games in his lifetime than the vast majority of chairmen. But he is clearly not getting good advice on who would make a good manager for Wolves.

posted on 4/5/13

I agree Crikey - I dont doubt he's well intentioned.

But with his track record of choice of manager those good intentions are taking us back to the fourth division.

posted on 4/5/13

the season we spent 26 mill of the pitch , when it needed spending on it.

mick would have bought better players (on the whole)

no knee jerk to the 5-1 as it probaly wouldnt have happened, and the rest is history

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment